Re: Exciting New Birth Control Method Called “S ocialism”

On 8/1/26 10:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
> On 8/1/2026 1:17 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 12:44:34 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/31/2026 5:13 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:18:26 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 7/31/2026 3:55 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/31/26 10:17 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/31/2026 12:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/31/26 9:20 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 7/30/2026 12:46 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/30/26 7:40 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Government causes problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Collectivists blame it on rich people.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> yes bro, our govts are largely not run collectively, they are
>>>>>>>>>> largely run by the wealthy to manage the collective.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hey, here's an idea. If the government is the problem fix the
>>>>>>>>> government.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> yeah and how do we do that when the livelihoods of politicians are
>>>>>>>> entirely predicated on the wealthy donors who fund them???
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not only that, but the people who make up the permanent 
>>>>>>> administrative
>>>>>>> state want their nest feathered as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if ur talking about bribes or even just regulatory capture...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the wealthy have the most money to do that as well
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the wealthy have the most money to do all the corruption ur 
>>>>>> complaining
>>>>>> about
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but u refuse to admit this because idk, simple reality is just too 
>>>>>> much
>>>>>> for you to handle.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm talking about the deep state functionaries who are virtually
>>>>> unfireable wanting to maintain their system of permanent employment 
>>>>> and
>>>>> control.
>>>>
>>>> Himbo has demonstrated that no such level exists in government.
>>>>
>>>> In fact, in terms of control, the election of himbo twice confirms
>>>> that.  If they had control, that would not have happened.
>>>
>>> Influence =/= control.
>>
>> Significant influence is lacking then.  Himbo's presidency proves that
>> much.
>>
>> You are hedging now.  Tara might even say fudging.  Now put that
>> marble back where it was.
> 
> The right answer is to make all of the executive branch employees 
> fireable by the person in charge of the executive branch. The congress 
> won't do that but they should.

i'm not really sure how firing and rehiring the entire govt every 4 
years could ever be efficient... these aren't orgs that can be replaced 
by competition dud. they run integral systems within society that we 
actually do depend on

besides... this is not really really the point of electing a president. 
the president does not set policy, the president just leads the org that 
enacts the policy set by congress. if the bureaucrats are making 
decision, then policy needs to change, and congress should be doing 
that, not the president

ofc, no one guarantee a govt ideals from the 1700s would scale forever. 
i don't think inducing fed employee churn is a meaningfully resolution 
to our problems wilson

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃