Re: oh, it's called a sweeping generalization retard ...

On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 08:54:58 -0700, dart200
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On 8/2/26 12:15 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 19:31:20 -0700, dart200
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 8/1/26 10:40 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/1/2026 1:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> u literally justify overriding free market principles with closed
>>>>> borders because u profit from it!
>>>>>
>>>>> seriously, capitalists have no principles. it's all up for grabs when
>>>>> there is profit to be made!
>>>>>
>>>>> it's fucking incredible you cried about how capitalism depends on
>>>>> people acting ethically ... while here you are in just a thread over
>>>>> shitting on basic principles of voluntary association because YOU
>>>>> benefit from doing so!
>>>>>
>>>>> god ur such a delusionally confused basket case wilson and ur wholly
>>>>> incapable of realizing it because the level of cognitive dissonance in
>>>>> just how much a shithead u've been for long would be too much for ur
>>>>> underdeveloped mind to handle,
>>>>
>>>> My business actually profits more from open borders and no tariffs.
>>>>
>>>> Open borders means more customers. Over 20% of my customers are immigrants.
>>>>
>>>> No tariffs means lower prices for my products.
>>>>
>>>> I support restricted immigration and some tariffs because I think it
>>>> benefits the young and low pay workers. And in the end that will benefit
>>>> the country at large even if it works against my short-term interests.
>>>
>>> which is still YOUR selected interests moron, as opposed to supporting
>>> the principles generally for _all_  ???
>>>
>>>>
>>>> As to free association, that's been illegal in this country for 50 some
>>>> years. I'd support bringing it back as it empowers the individual
>>>> against the bureaucratic machine state.
>>>>
>>>
>>> right we should end minimum wage too ofc
>> 
>> The bureaucratic machine state (not deep state any more), is mostly
>> there to protect the interests of citizens against big business.
>> Wilson wants no such protections for us, and so maligns it
>> relentlessly.  It is responsible for everything wrong and nothing
>> good.  And citizens need to be protected from its own protector.
>
>i mean think about it this way noah:
>
>once we remove minimum wage, then low wage workers will lose their 
>advantage over 3rd world workers, so the con's argument for border 
>protection will disappear!

I don't think that low wage earners should be burdened with our
crusade to conquer con's arguments.  Likely they will agree, but they
don't need to take a kick in the nuts for us.
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away