Re: oh, it's called a sweeping generalization retard ...

On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 13:07:22 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 8/2/2026 12:38 PM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 8/1/2026 10:31 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/1/26 10:40 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/1/2026 1:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> u literally justify overriding free market principles with closed 
>>>>> borders because u profit from it!
>>>>>
>>>>> seriously, capitalists have no principles. it's all up for grabs 
>>>>> when there is profit to be made!
>>>>>
>>>>> it's fucking incredible you cried about how capitalism depends on 
>>>>> people acting ethically ... while here you are in just a thread over 
>>>>> shitting on basic principles of voluntary association because YOU 
>>>>> benefit from doing so!
>>>>>
>>>>> god ur such a delusionally confused basket case wilson and ur wholly 
>>>>> incapable of realizing it because the level of cognitive dissonance 
>>>>> in just how much a shithead u've been for long would be too much for 
>>>>> ur underdeveloped mind to handle,
>>>>
>>>> My business actually profits more from open borders and no tariffs.
>>>>
>>>> Open borders means more customers. Over 20% of my customers are 
>>>> immigrants.
>>>>
>>>> No tariffs means lower prices for my products.
>>>>
>>>> I support restricted immigration and some tariffs because I think it 
>>>> benefits the young and low pay workers. And in the end that will 
>>>> benefit the country at large even if it works against my short-term 
>>>> interests.
>>>
>>> which is still YOUR selected interests moron, as opposed to supporting 
>>> the principles generally for _all_  ???
>> 
>> Wait. You're saying those are my "selected interests" because I care 
>> about young people and the low wage population? And think that their 
>> lives matter for both ethical reasons and because what happens to them 
>> affects the entire society?
>> 
>> While those ideas I support ALSO literally limit my income?
>> 
>> So I'm an evil self-interested bastard because I care about people now.
>
>I think the smartest and most competent should remain in their home 
>countries where they can help uplift their local economies. Instead of 
>immigrating to the West and leaving their compatriots to live in poverty.
>
>Rather than strip mining the third world for brainpower the wealthy west 
>should be investing in those places and helping them to improve.
>
>Of course the usual idiots would call that "colonialism" and claim the 
>investors were only doing the investing to make themselves richer.
>
>While claiming that hiring immigrants in the West, resulting in overall 
>lower wages in the West, is somehow improving the world. Somehow.
>
>Truly.

That is some damn slick smoke and mirrors.  Kudos.
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away