Re: oh, it's called a sweeping generalization retard ...

On 8/2/2026 9:34 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 12:29:43 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/1/2026 7:38 PM, Dude wrote:
>>> On 8/1/2026 3:01 PM, Tara wrote:
>>>> On Aug 1, 2026 at 5:51:37?PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> On 01/08/2026 22:15, Tara wrote:
>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2026 at 2:40:32?PM EDT, "Wilson" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/1/2026 2:10 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2026 13:40:13 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/1/2026 1:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> u literally justify overriding free market principles with closed
>>>>>>>>>> borders because u profit from it!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> seriously, capitalists have no principles. it's all up for grabs
>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>> there is profit to be made!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> it's fucking incredible you cried about how capitalism depends
>>>>>>>>>> on people
>>>>>>>>>> acting ethically ... while here you are in just a thread over
>>>>>>>>>> shitting
>>>>>>>>>> on basic principles of voluntary association because YOU benefit
>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>> doing so!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> god ur such a delusionally confused basket case wilson and ur
>>>>>>>>>> wholly
>>>>>>>>>> incapable of realizing it because the level of cognitive
>>>>>>>>>> dissonance in
>>>>>>>>>> just how much a shithead u've been for long would be too much
>>>>>>>>>> for ur
>>>>>>>>>> underdeveloped mind to handle,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My business actually profits more from open borders and no tariffs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Open borders means more customers. Over 20% of my customers are
>>>>>>>>> immigrants.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No tariffs means lower prices for my products.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I support restricted immigration and some tariffs because I think it
>>>>>>>>> benefits the young and low pay workers. And in the end that will
>>>>>>>>> benefit
>>>>>>>>> the country at large even if it works against my short-term
>>>>>>>>> interests.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As to free association, that's been illegal in this country for
>>>>>>>>> 50 some
>>>>>>>>> years. I'd support bringing it back as it empowers the individual
>>>>>>>>> against the bureaucratic machine state.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That sounds yummy.  But it does not square with what you have been
>>>>>>>> saying here for the last ten years that I have been noticing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've never once said that my opposition to mass immigration was
>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>> it benefits me. Same with tariffs. That was solely your
>>>>>>> interpretation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems to me like you're hearing what you want to hear because it
>>>>>>> fits
>>>>>>> your ideological biases. And because it's easier to deal with people
>>>>>>> when you categorize them into boxes that have been predefined.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Boom, into that box you go Wilson. And never shall you be allowed to
>>>>>>> escape!"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> True. This is why your view, if you want to be understood, when
>>>>>> conversing
>>>>>> with certain people, I think needs to be pretty well spelled out.
>>>>>> maybe over
>>>>>> and over again.
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't work with people who are so sure of their mind reading
>>>>> ability that they believe they know your mind, thoughts, words and deeds
>>>>> better than you do yourself no matter how many times you tell them
>>>>> otherwise. If they respected you one correction would suffice.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah!  Lets get some respect here eh. :)
>>>
>>>   From Nick?
>>
>> It doesn't happen from Nick or from Noah. Both frame things in black and
>> white. While claiming that everyone else is so ideological.
> 
> No, that would be only you.  It was love's claim, not mine but I
> agree.
> 
> Admitted:
> Himbo is black
> He surrounds himself with sycophants and punishes those who criticize
> him, etc.
 >
You probably think this is all about you. Compared to Nick, your persona 
is at least relatable.