Re: oh, it's called a sweeping generalization retard ...
Dude <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Aug 2026 19:58:42 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/31/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote: > On 7/31/26 3:16 PM, Creon wrote: >> At Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:14:40 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 7/31/2026 1:53 AM, dart200 wrote: >>>> On 7/30/26 9:25 PM, Creon wrote: >>>>> At Thu, 30 Jul 2026 20:43:53 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/30/2026 6:53 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/30/26 6:44 PM, Creon wrote: >>>>>>>> At Thu, 30 Jul 2026 19:42:44 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 21:47:37 +0000, Creon <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> At Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:02:12 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Post your opinion here: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Fine, I shall: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think there is too much "baseline fallacy" in the economics >>>>>>>>>> discussion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And, I think the idea that the wealthy buy politicians is >>>>>>>>>> a bit trite. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And the reason certain ideas become trite is... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> $ dict trite >>>>>>>> 2 definitions found >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English >>>>>>>> v.0.48 >>>>>>>> [gcide]: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Trite \Trite\ (tr[imac]t), a. [L. tritus, p. p. of terere to >>>>>>>> rub, to wear out; probably akin to E. throw. See >>>>>>>> {Throw}, and >>>>>>>> cf. {Contrite}, {Detriment}, {Tribulation}, {Try}.] >>>>>>>> Worn out; common; used until so common as to have lost >>>>>>>> novelty and interest; hackneyed; stale; as, a trite >>>>>>>> remark; a >>>>>>>> trite subject. -- {Trite"ly}, adv. -- {Trite"ness}, n. >>>>>>>> [1913 Webster] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006) [wn]: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> trite >>>>>>>> adj 1: repeated too often; overfamiliar through overuse; >>>>>>>> "bromidic sermons"; "his remarks were trite and >>>>>>>> commonplace"; "hackneyed phrases"; "a stock >>>>>>>> answer"; >>>>>>>> "repeating threadbare jokes"; "parroting some >>>>>>>> timeworn >>>>>>>> axiom"; "the trite metaphor `hard as nails'" [syn: >>>>>>>> {banal}, {commonplace}, {hackneyed}, {old-hat}, >>>>>>>> {shopworn}, {stock(a)}, {threadbare}, {timeworn}, >>>>>>>> {tired}, {trite}, {well-worn}] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ...and have I introduced you to the "panopticon" theory of media >>>>>>>> dynamics? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Media doesn't report what everyone thinks, it reports what it wants >>>>>>>> everyone to think everyone thinks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Political corruption is a problem, but implying that _all_ >>>>>>>> wealthy people are part of that is...a baseline fallacy. >>>>>>> seriously this group is literally just noah + a bunch of retarded >>>>>>> cons >>>>>>> with their heads stuck up their butts, eh??? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> it's statistically provable that public opinion does _not_ influence >>>>>>> federal policy, and that only the opinion of the wealthy matters >>>>>>> in us >>>>>>> federal policy. they do this by surveying groups of people, >>>>>>> segmenting >>>>>>> them by wealth class, and comparing that to the result of public >>>>>>> policy. >>>>>>> it's not a hard analysis. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> in order to claim the /baserate/ fallacy u need some stats to >>>>>>> back that >>>>>>> up, claiming it out of the blue is just a _bear_ assertion >>>>>>> >>>>>> That should be a wrap! >>>>> >>>>> Yes. Specifically, fishrap. >>>>> >>>>> (It's used to attract the _bear_s, I guess?) >>>>> >>>>> dart200 is confused, that's not what the baseline fallacy >>>>> is. The baseline fallacy is assuming "all" for "many", because >>>>> the large majority of a group form a "baseline" that is then >>>>> used to pigeonhole the whole group. >>>> >>>> nigga are you going to respond with anything useful? >>>> >>> The base line on this board is that the claim you are referring to is >>> entirely false and fabricated, originating from a mashup of internet >>> rumors and memes made up by informants which have all been refuted and >>> found to be spurious, crude racist and biased - on this very board! >>> >>> Don't make us go back there, Nick. It won't be easy on your ego. You >>> came here to get enlightened. >>> >>> You came to a bowling alley. Now You're our Bitch. >>> > >>> > >>>> > or just keep proving wealth turns _all_ into retarded children??? >>>> > >>>> > #god >>>> >>>> cause that's just a true generalization ... not a fallacy >>>> >>>> and i believe we'll prove it true when build transparent systems >>>> >>>> > 🖕🤣🖕 >>>> > >>>> > #god >>>> >>> The base rate fallacy (often called a baseline fallacy) is a thinking >>> error where you ignore general statistical facts (the "base rate") and >>> focus only on small, specific details or a single story >>>>> >>>>> But I'm sure Nick knew all that. That's what I like about him: >>>>> his attention to detail. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My biz partner has met with the FCC, along >>>>>>>>>> with other representatives from regional ISPs that he >>>>>>>>>> picked up along the way. Can't afford lobbiests? Lobby >>>>>>>>>> yourself. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Someday I'll have to tell you our "coopetition" story. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Note: The opinions expressed by informants are their own and >>>>>>>>>>> do not >>>>>>>>>>> necessarily represent the views of all Usenet board subscribers. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> I would really rather not see the mental midget quoted >> if he's going to throw tantrums. >> >> Otherwise, it will be off to the cornfield for you, too. ;) >> > > imagine being such a goddamn pussy ur gunna threaten to block others if > they don't abide by ur blocklist > > > humanity never ceases to reach for new kinds of low > > > > #god > Imagine being such a goddamn pussy you're going to pretend to be the rich guy in a chat room. Compared to your current situation, all the subscribers posting here are living on Easy Street. What happened?