Re: oh, it's called a sweeping generalization retard ...

On 8/2/2026 11:38 AM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/2/26 10:49 AM, Dude wrote:
>> On 8/2/2026 10:13 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/2/26 9:38 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/1/2026 10:31 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/1/26 10:40 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/1/2026 1:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> u literally justify overriding free market principles with closed 
>>>>>>> borders because u profit from it!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> seriously, capitalists have no principles. it's all up for grabs 
>>>>>>> when there is profit to be made!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it's fucking incredible you cried about how capitalism depends on 
>>>>>>> people acting ethically ... while here you are in just a thread 
>>>>>>> over shitting on basic principles of voluntary association 
>>>>>>> because YOU benefit from doing so!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> god ur such a delusionally confused basket case wilson and ur 
>>>>>>> wholly incapable of realizing it because the level of cognitive 
>>>>>>> dissonance in just how much a shithead u've been for long would 
>>>>>>> be too much for ur underdeveloped mind to handle,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My business actually profits more from open borders and no tariffs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open borders means more customers. Over 20% of my customers are 
>>>>>> immigrants.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No tariffs means lower prices for my products.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I support restricted immigration and some tariffs because I think 
>>>>>> it benefits the young and low pay workers. And in the end that 
>>>>>> will benefit the country at large even if it works against my 
>>>>>> short-term interests.
>>>>>
>>>>> which is still YOUR selected interests moron, as opposed to 
>>>>> supporting the principles generally for _all_  🖕🙄🖕
>>>>
>>>> Wait. You're saying those are my "selected interests" because I care 
>>>> about young people and the low wage population?
>>> there is a world of young people and even lower wage population you 
>>> are willfully ignoring because it's not YOUR selected interest
>>>
>> It should be in your selected interest to develop a skill that is 
>> marketable for employment, Nick. You're not young anymore.
> 
> it should be in ur interest to not be a fucking idiot, but we both know 
> ur going to take ur stupidity to grave, and that's how the problem you 
> being a fucking idiot will self-resolve dud
>
So, I'm doing alright, living on easy street. What happened to you?
 >

> i do not like you, and i do think i will ever like you dud
>
You came here for the truth, Nick. You've got to get back on the 
program. Life is getting serious at thirty-something.
 > >>
>> The argument against immigration is the cultural-preservationist 
>> argument for border restrictions: Diverse groups weaken shared 
>> national traditions, values, and languages. An immigrant loses 
>> cultural and social cohesion and gets assimilated.
> 
> i'm sorry where did the "except for pReSeRvInG mUh cUlTuRe" get 
> established an a valid exception to violate the nap to prevent free 
> association???
> 
> (u fucking subethical racist)
> 
Assimilated means your culture disappears. That's when you realize that 
what was your land and your people have been annihilated, Nick.

Reduced to casino operators living on a reservation in the desert, Nick. 
Is that fucking subethical racist or what?

You lazy twat!