Re: Laws Of The Internet
Dude <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 15:56:53 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/3/2026 2:59 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 14:19:47 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote: > >> "The Overriding Law of the Internet: The Thing We Talk About is the >> Thing We Love." - Ned >> >> Ned Ludd's 1st law: >> >> All posts to Usenet are ultimately self-referential. >> >> Ned Ludd's 2nd law: >> >> Any unmoderated Usenet group dedicated to a specific subject will >> eventually attract a majority of participants who are dedicated to >> opposing, insulting and interfering with the participants who wish to >> foster, praise and advance the subject matter of the group. >> >> Ned Ludd's 3rd law: >> >> The validity of the central point of any article posted to the internet >> is inversely proportional to the length of the article proposing it. >> >> Cunningham's Law: >> >> The best way to get the right answer on the Internet is not to ask a >> question, but rather to post the wrong answer. Internet users can easily >> ignore a request for help, but have a hard time resisting the urge to >> appear smarter than the original poster. >> >> 1. Godwin’s Law: >> >> The most famous of all the internet laws, formed by Mike Godwin in 1990. >> As originally stated, it said: "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the >> probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1." >> >> 2. Poe’s Law >> >> Not to be confused with the law of poetry enshrined by Edgar Allan Poe, >> the internet Poe’s Law states: “Without a winking smiley or other >> blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody of >> fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing.” >> >> 3. Rule 34 States: >> >> “If it exists, there is porn of it.” See also Rule 35: “If no such porn >> exists, it will be made.” Generally held to refer to fictional >> characters and cartoons, although some formulations insist there are "no >> exceptions" even for abstract ideas like non-Euclidean geometry, or >> puzzlement. >> >> 4. Skitt’s Law: >> >> Expressed as "any post correcting an error in another post will contain >> at least one error itself" or "the likelihood of an error in a post is >> directly proportional to the embarrassment it will cause the poster." >> >> 5. Scopie’s Law >> States: “In any discussion involving science or medicine, citing >> Whale.to as a credible source loses the argument immediately, and gets >> you laughed out of the room.” >> >> 6. Danth’s Law (also known as Parker’s Law): >> >> >> States: “If you have to insist that you've won an internet argument, >> you've probably lost badly.” >> >> 7. Pommer’s Law: >> >> States: “A person's mind can be changed by reading information on the >> internet. The nature of this change will be from having no opinion to >> having a wrong opinion.” >> >> 8. DeMyer's Laws: >> >> There are four: the Zeroth, First, Second and Third Laws. The Second Law >> states: “Anyone who posts an argument on the internet which is largely >> quotations can be very safely ignored, and is deemed to have lost the >> argument before it has begun.” The Zeroth, First and Third Laws cannot >> be very generally applied and will be glossed over here. >> >> 9. Cohen’s Law: >> >> States that: “Whoever resorts to the argument that ‘whoever resorts to >> the argument that... …has automatically lost the debate’ has >> automatically lost the debate.” >> >> 10. The Law of Exclamation: >> >> "The more exclamation points used in an email (or other posting), the >> more likely it is a complete lie. This is also true for excessive >> capital letters." >> >> 11. The law of the excluded middle: >> >> "The more laws on the internet the less information." (Dude addendum) >> > > The law of self confirmation: > This message mentions hitler. Noted: 12. The law of self confirmation: This message mentions hitler. > >> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/RH6Z8IeH2z8/m/8f47BfB1BQAJ