Re: Laws Of The Internet
dart200 <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 23:43:44 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/3/26 2:19 PM, Dude wrote: > "The Overriding Law of the Internet: The Thing We Talk About is the > Thing We Love." - Ned > > Ned Ludd's 1st law: > > All posts to Usenet are ultimately self-referential. > > Ned Ludd's 2nd law: > > Any unmoderated Usenet group dedicated to a specific subject will > eventually attract a majority of participants who are dedicated to > opposing, insulting and interfering with the participants who wish to > foster, praise and advance the subject matter of the group. > > Ned Ludd's 3rd law: > > The validity of the central point of any article posted to the internet > is inversely proportional to the length of the article proposing it. > > Cunningham's Law: > > The best way to get the right answer on the Internet is not to ask a > question, but rather to post the wrong answer. Internet users can easily > ignore a request for help, but have a hard time resisting the urge to > appear smarter than the original poster. > > 1. Godwin’s Law: > > The most famous of all the internet laws, formed by Mike Godwin in 1990. > As originally stated, it said: "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the > probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1." > > 2. Poe’s Law > > Not to be confused with the law of poetry enshrined by Edgar Allan Poe, > the internet Poe’s Law states: “Without a winking smiley or other > blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody of > fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing.” > > 3. Rule 34 States: > > “If it exists, there is porn of it.” See also Rule 35: “If no such porn > exists, it will be made.” Generally held to refer to fictional > characters and cartoons, although some formulations insist there are "no > exceptions" even for abstract ideas like non-Euclidean geometry, or > puzzlement. > > 4. Skitt’s Law: > > Expressed as "any post correcting an error in another post will contain > at least one error itself" or "the likelihood of an error in a post is > directly proportional to the embarrassment it will cause the poster." > > 5. Scopie’s Law > States: “In any discussion involving science or medicine, citing > Whale.to as a credible source loses the argument immediately, and gets > you laughed out of the room.” > > 6. Danth’s Law (also known as Parker’s Law): > > > States: “If you have to insist that you've won an internet argument, > you've probably lost badly.” > > 7. Pommer’s Law: > > States: “A person's mind can be changed by reading information on the > internet. The nature of this change will be from having no opinion to > having a wrong opinion.” > > 8. DeMyer's Laws: > > There are four: the Zeroth, First, Second and Third Laws. The Second Law > states: “Anyone who posts an argument on the internet which is largely > quotations can be very safely ignored, and is deemed to have lost the > argument before it has begun.” The Zeroth, First and Third Laws cannot > be very generally applied and will be glossed over here. > > 9. Cohen’s Law: > > States that: “Whoever resorts to the argument that ‘whoever resorts to > the argument that... …has automatically lost the debate’ has > automatically lost the debate.” > > 10. The Law of Exclamation: > > "The more exclamation points used in an email (or other posting), the > more likely it is a complete lie. This is also true for excessive > capital letters." word on the street is that i use less caps than the rest of ya'll ✌️ > > 11. The law of the excluded middle: > > "The more laws on the internet the less information." (Dude addendum) > > https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/RH6Z8IeH2z8/ > m/8f47BfB1BQAJ -- hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃