Re: Laws Of The Internet
dart200 <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 13:58:10 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/4/26 8:47 AM, Dude wrote: > On 8/3/2026 11:43 PM, dart200 wrote: >> On 8/3/26 2:19 PM, Dude wrote: >>> "The Overriding Law of the Internet: The Thing We Talk About is the >>> Thing We Love." - Ned >>> >>> Ned Ludd's 1st law: >>> >>> All posts to Usenet are ultimately self-referential. >>> >>> Ned Ludd's 2nd law: >>> >>> Any unmoderated Usenet group dedicated to a specific subject will >>> eventually attract a majority of participants who are dedicated to >>> opposing, insulting and interfering with the participants who wish to >>> foster, praise and advance the subject matter of the group. >>> >>> Ned Ludd's 3rd law: >>> >>> The validity of the central point of any article posted to the >>> internet is inversely proportional to the length of the article >>> proposing it. >>> >>> Cunningham's Law: >>> >>> The best way to get the right answer on the Internet is not to ask a >>> question, but rather to post the wrong answer. Internet users can >>> easily ignore a request for help, but have a hard time resisting the >>> urge to appear smarter than the original poster. >>> >>> 1. Godwin’s Law: >>> >>> The most famous of all the internet laws, formed by Mike Godwin in >>> 1990. As originally stated, it said: "As a Usenet discussion grows >>> longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler >>> approaches 1." >>> >>> 2. Poe’s Law >>> >>> Not to be confused with the law of poetry enshrined by Edgar Allan >>> Poe, the internet Poe’s Law states: “Without a winking smiley or >>> other blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody >>> of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing.” >>> >>> 3. Rule 34 States: >>> >>> “If it exists, there is porn of it.” See also Rule 35: “If no such >>> porn exists, it will be made.” Generally held to refer to fictional >>> characters and cartoons, although some formulations insist there are >>> "no exceptions" even for abstract ideas like non-Euclidean geometry, >>> or puzzlement. >>> >>> 4. Skitt’s Law: >>> >>> Expressed as "any post correcting an error in another post will >>> contain at least one error itself" or "the likelihood of an error in >>> a post is directly proportional to the embarrassment it will cause >>> the poster." >>> >>> 5. Scopie’s Law >>> States: “In any discussion involving science or medicine, citing >>> Whale.to as a credible source loses the argument immediately, and >>> gets you laughed out of the room.” >>> >>> 6. Danth’s Law (also known as Parker’s Law): >>> >>> >>> States: “If you have to insist that you've won an internet argument, >>> you've probably lost badly.” >>> >>> 7. Pommer’s Law: >>> >>> States: “A person's mind can be changed by reading information on the >>> internet. The nature of this change will be from having no opinion to >>> having a wrong opinion.” >>> >>> 8. DeMyer's Laws: >>> >>> There are four: the Zeroth, First, Second and Third Laws. The Second >>> Law states: “Anyone who posts an argument on the internet which is >>> largely quotations can be very safely ignored, and is deemed to have >>> lost the argument before it has begun.” The Zeroth, First and Third >>> Laws cannot be very generally applied and will be glossed over here. >>> >>> 9. Cohen’s Law: >>> >>> States that: “Whoever resorts to the argument that ‘whoever resorts >>> to the argument that... …has automatically lost the debate’ has >>> automatically lost the debate.” >>> >>> 10. The Law of Exclamation: >>> >>> "The more exclamation points used in an email (or other posting), the >>> more likely it is a complete lie. This is also true for excessive >>> capital letters." >> >> word on the street is that i use less caps than the rest of ya'll ✌️ >> > The question is, are you smarter than a 5th Grader? word on the street is that u never even passed 5th grade which is why ur so obsessed with it > > "Our younger generation is lost. While it doesn't apply to all > millennials, I think most are humorless. They can't take a joke and they > can't tell a joke. Overly sensitive narcissistic solipsists. And social > media is the culprit. They don't read books. They could care less about > history. They are fluent in the cliches of the early third millennium - > diversity, inclusion, equity, anti-racism, antipatriarchy, > antiheteronormativity - ostensibly political but actually just > emotionally satisfying performative demands." > > Feel better now? that ned it dead? ya prolly > > Ned > > >>> >>> 11. The law of the excluded middle: >>> >>> "The more laws on the internet the less information." (Dude addendum) >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.buddha.short.fat.guy/c/RH6Z8IeH2z8/ >>> m/8f47BfB1BQAJ >> > -- hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃