Re: Private Property

Noah Sombrero <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
Organization Noah's Kitchen
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 09:32:33 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 8/9/2026 9:18 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 09:03:41 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 8/9/2026 8:45 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> At its core, free enterprise and a market economy can be reduced in many
>>>> ways to an economic ideology centered around private property.  It gives
>>>> me extraordinary joy to see how our founders, in writing the Declaration
>>>> of Independence, declared that all men were "endowed by their Creator
>>>> with certain unalienable rights, among them are life, liberty, and the
>>>> pursuit of happiness."
>>>>
>>>> Here, the founders took the natural rights John Locke wrote about in his
>>>> Second Treatise of Government in 1690 – "lives, liberties, and estates,
>>>> which I call by the general name, property," and broadened it.  They
>>>> presupposed that property was necessary for liberty and that the greater
>>>> aspiration behind private property was "pursuit of happiness" (what we
>>>> call "human flourishing" in my tradition).
>>>>
>>>> Just weeks before the Declaration of Independence was written, George
>>>> Mason had codified in the Virginia Declaration of Rights that "the
>>>> enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and
>>>> possessing property" were predicates to "pursuing and obtaining
>>>> happiness and safety."  The founding fathers were not waxing and waning
>>>> philosophically – well, they were not /only/ doing that – they were
>>>> expressing the lived experience of the settlers in the new world.
>>>>
>>>> The lived experience that served as the bedrock of our nation was one of
>>>> private ownership driving incentives, of communal ownership discouraging
>>>> productive work, and one where resentment was inevitable when rewards
>>>> were equal, but effort was not.  Communal ownership of property had
>>>> failed in practice because it was first a failed theory.
>>>>
>>>> Private property is a natural right that flows from our ability to earn,
>>>> hold, possess, retain, and manage the fruits of our own labor.  It
>>>> produces responsibility, stewardship, and abundance that align with
>>>> human nature.
>> 
>> It can be defined that way...or not.  
> >
>Did you complete 5th grade history class?
> >
>There is nothing a priori about it.
>>
>You're cutting out again. A natural human right is a priori, that's why 
>it is called a natural right, meaning from birth.

You can define it that way if you insist.  I insist otherwise.


>We studied this in school: The French Revolution
>
>The revolution ended noble land monopolies and peasant dues in 1789.. 
>Established private property as a basic human right. How?
>
>By abolishing feudal land rights and establishing legal protections for 
>individual ownership in the Declaration of the Rights of Man.
> >
>
>>>> David L. Bahnsen
>>>>
>>> We studied this in school: The French Revolution
>>>
>>> The revolution ended noble land monopolies and peasant dues in 1789..
>>> Established private property as a basic human right. How?
>>>
>>> By abolishing feudal land rights and establishing legal protections for
>>> individual ownership in the Declaration of the Rights of Man.
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.