Re: Private Property
Noah Sombrero <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Noah's Kitchen |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 09:32:33 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote: >On 8/9/2026 9:18 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >> On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 09:03:41 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 8/9/2026 8:45 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>> >>>> At its core, free enterprise and a market economy can be reduced in many >>>> ways to an economic ideology centered around private property. It gives >>>> me extraordinary joy to see how our founders, in writing the Declaration >>>> of Independence, declared that all men were "endowed by their Creator >>>> with certain unalienable rights, among them are life, liberty, and the >>>> pursuit of happiness." >>>> >>>> Here, the founders took the natural rights John Locke wrote about in his >>>> Second Treatise of Government in 1690  "lives, liberties, and estates, >>>> which I call by the general name, property," and broadened it. They >>>> presupposed that property was necessary for liberty and that the greater >>>> aspiration behind private property was "pursuit of happiness" (what we >>>> call "human flourishing" in my tradition). >>>> >>>> Just weeks before the Declaration of Independence was written, George >>>> Mason had codified in the Virginia Declaration of Rights that "the >>>> enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and >>>> possessing property" were predicates to "pursuing and obtaining >>>> happiness and safety." The founding fathers were not waxing and waning >>>> philosophically  well, they were not /only/ doing that  they were >>>> expressing the lived experience of the settlers in the new world. >>>> >>>> The lived experience that served as the bedrock of our nation was one of >>>> private ownership driving incentives, of communal ownership discouraging >>>> productive work, and one where resentment was inevitable when rewards >>>> were equal, but effort was not. Communal ownership of property had >>>> failed in practice because it was first a failed theory. >>>> >>>> Private property is a natural right that flows from our ability to earn, >>>> hold, possess, retain, and manage the fruits of our own labor. It >>>> produces responsibility, stewardship, and abundance that align with >>>> human nature. >> >> It can be defined that way...or not. > > >Did you complete 5th grade history class? > > >There is nothing a priori about it. >> >You're cutting out again. A natural human right is a priori, that's why >it is called a natural right, meaning from birth. You can define it that way if you insist. I insist otherwise. >We studied this in school: The French Revolution > >The revolution ended noble land monopolies and peasant dues in 1789.. >Established private property as a basic human right. How? > >By abolishing feudal land rights and establishing legal protections for >individual ownership in the Declaration of the Rights of Man. > > > >>>> David L. Bahnsen >>>> >>> We studied this in school: The French Revolution >>> >>> The revolution ended noble land monopolies and peasant dues in 1789.. >>> Established private property as a basic human right. How? >>> >>> By abolishing feudal land rights and establishing legal protections for >>> individual ownership in the Declaration of the Rights of Man. -- Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain Don't get political with me young man or I'll tie you to a railroad track and <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>> Who dares to talk to El Sombrero? dares: Ned does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away