Re: on the unspoken truth about wildfires

On 8/9/2026 2:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/9/26 6:23 AM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 8/8/2026 8:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/8/26 10:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/7/2026 5:43 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:05:44 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 14:22:46 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There aren't a lot of studies that have tried to reconstruct 
>>>>>>>> temps over
>>>>>>>> the past 10k years, but this chart comes from one that seems to be
>>>>>>>> highly regarded:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0530-7/figures/3
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, I think this graph shows exactly what I have been talking
>>>>>>> about.  Look to the far right of the graph.  Do you see something
>>>>>>> alarming?  For a better look, go to the close up view below the big
>>>>>>> graph.  What do you see to the far right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it looks to me to be not quite as high as the highest estimated
>>>>>> possible temps from ~6k years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think you are looking at that far right meteoric climb.  You
>>>>> see the same effect here
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
>>>>>
>>>>> where you can see the lia relative to recent temps.  Are you still in
>>>>> denial?  Of course you are.
>>>>
>>>> Current temps are by most estimates about the same as 6kya. Some 
>>>> will claim that we are higher now. Some say not quite as high yet.
>>>
>>> yeah but wilson u don't even trust paleoclimatic reconstruction so 
>>> what do u even know, eh?
>>
>> You said this before and I don't know why. They are using proxies, but 
>> I think the reconstructions do have value.
>>
> 
> because you've literally claimed multiple times now that u don't trust 
> paleoclimatic reconstruction for the past century.
> 
> (cause you want to be able to keep denying that warming greatly 
> accelerated in the 2nd half of the 20th century)
> 
> i get that ur basically completely retarded but that is what you've been 
> doing

I've criticized some reconstructions of the ancient climate. That 
doesn't mean I think they're all crap.