Re: on the unspoken truth about wildfires

On 8/9/26 11:32 AM, Wilson wrote:
> On 8/9/2026 2:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/9/26 6:23 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 8/8/2026 8:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/8/26 10:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 8/7/2026 5:43 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:05:44 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 14:22:46 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There aren't a lot of studies that have tried to reconstruct 
>>>>>>>>> temps over
>>>>>>>>> the past 10k years, but this chart comes from one that seems to be
>>>>>>>>> highly regarded:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0530-7/figures/3
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually, I think this graph shows exactly what I have been talking
>>>>>>>> about.  Look to the far right of the graph.  Do you see something
>>>>>>>> alarming?  For a better look, go to the close up view below the big
>>>>>>>> graph.  What do you see to the far right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, it looks to me to be not quite as high as the highest estimated
>>>>>>> possible temps from ~6k years ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think you are looking at that far right meteoric climb.  You
>>>>>> see the same effect here
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
>>>>>>
>>>>>> where you can see the lia relative to recent temps.  Are you still in
>>>>>> denial?  Of course you are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Current temps are by most estimates about the same as 6kya. Some 
>>>>> will claim that we are higher now. Some say not quite as high yet.
>>>>
>>>> yeah but wilson u don't even trust paleoclimatic reconstruction so 
>>>> what do u even know, eh?
>>>
>>> You said this before and I don't know why. They are using proxies, 
>>> but I think the reconstructions do have value.
>>>
>>
>> because you've literally claimed multiple times now that u don't trust 
>> paleoclimatic reconstruction for the past century.
>>
>> (cause you want to be able to keep denying that warming greatly 
>> accelerated in the 2nd half of the 20th century)
>>
>> i get that ur basically completely retarded but that is what you've 
>> been doing
> 
> I've criticized some reconstructions of the ancient climate. That 
> doesn't mean I think they're all crap.
> 

yeah u criticized that which doesn't support your position, and 
apparently are directly admitting that you cherry pick that which does 
support your position ...

even if the part you're arbitrarily deciding to "criticize" is a 
reconstruction of more recent history with inherently more data points 
in support of it

u have literally zero idea what the fuck ur doing wilson, ideologues do 
be like that

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃