Re: on the unspoken truth about wildfires

On 8/9/2026 3:19 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/9/26 11:32 AM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 8/9/2026 2:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/9/26 6:23 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/8/2026 8:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/8/26 10:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 5:43 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:05:44 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 14:22:46 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There aren't a lot of studies that have tried to reconstruct 
>>>>>>>>>> temps over
>>>>>>>>>> the past 10k years, but this chart comes from one that seems 
>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>> highly regarded:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0530-7/figures/3
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually, I think this graph shows exactly what I have been 
>>>>>>>>> talking
>>>>>>>>> about.  Look to the far right of the graph.  Do you see something
>>>>>>>>> alarming?  For a better look, go to the close up view below the 
>>>>>>>>> big
>>>>>>>>> graph.  What do you see to the far right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, it looks to me to be not quite as high as the highest 
>>>>>>>> estimated
>>>>>>>> possible temps from ~6k years ago.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't think you are looking at that far right meteoric climb.  You
>>>>>>> see the same effect here
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> where you can see the lia relative to recent temps.  Are you 
>>>>>>> still in
>>>>>>> denial?  Of course you are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Current temps are by most estimates about the same as 6kya. Some 
>>>>>> will claim that we are higher now. Some say not quite as high yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> yeah but wilson u don't even trust paleoclimatic reconstruction so 
>>>>> what do u even know, eh?
>>>>
>>>> You said this before and I don't know why. They are using proxies, 
>>>> but I think the reconstructions do have value.
>>>>
>>>
>>> because you've literally claimed multiple times now that u don't 
>>> trust paleoclimatic reconstruction for the past century.
>>>
>>> (cause you want to be able to keep denying that warming greatly 
>>> accelerated in the 2nd half of the 20th century)
>>>
>>> i get that ur basically completely retarded but that is what you've 
>>> been doing
>>
>> I've criticized some reconstructions of the ancient climate. That 
>> doesn't mean I think they're all crap.
>>
> 
> yeah u criticized that which doesn't support your position, and 
> apparently are directly admitting that you cherry pick that which does 
> support your position ...
> 
> even if the part you're arbitrarily deciding to "criticize" is a 
> reconstruction of more recent history with inherently more data points 
> in support of it
> 
> u have literally zero idea what the fuck ur doing wilson, ideologues do 
> be like that
> 
Alright then, that should be a wrap. The unspoken truth, by consensus:

All informants on this list have zero idea what they are doing about 
wildfires.

Where's Creon?

Good work!