Re: on the unspoken truth about wildfires

On 8/9/26 3:43 PM, Dude wrote:
> On 8/9/2026 3:19 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/9/26 11:32 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 8/9/2026 2:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/9/26 6:23 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 8/8/2026 8:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/8/26 10:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 5:43 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:05:44 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 14:22:46 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There aren't a lot of studies that have tried to reconstruct 
>>>>>>>>>>> temps over
>>>>>>>>>>> the past 10k years, but this chart comes from one that seems 
>>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>> highly regarded:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0530-7/figures/3
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Actually, I think this graph shows exactly what I have been 
>>>>>>>>>> talking
>>>>>>>>>> about.  Look to the far right of the graph.  Do you see something
>>>>>>>>>> alarming?  For a better look, go to the close up view below 
>>>>>>>>>> the big
>>>>>>>>>> graph.  What do you see to the far right?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, it looks to me to be not quite as high as the highest 
>>>>>>>>> estimated
>>>>>>>>> possible temps from ~6k years ago.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't think you are looking at that far right meteoric climb.  
>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>> see the same effect here
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> where you can see the lia relative to recent temps.  Are you 
>>>>>>>> still in
>>>>>>>> denial?  Of course you are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Current temps are by most estimates about the same as 6kya. Some 
>>>>>>> will claim that we are higher now. Some say not quite as high yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yeah but wilson u don't even trust paleoclimatic reconstruction so 
>>>>>> what do u even know, eh?
>>>>>
>>>>> You said this before and I don't know why. They are using proxies, 
>>>>> but I think the reconstructions do have value.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> because you've literally claimed multiple times now that u don't 
>>>> trust paleoclimatic reconstruction for the past century.
>>>>
>>>> (cause you want to be able to keep denying that warming greatly 
>>>> accelerated in the 2nd half of the 20th century)
>>>>
>>>> i get that ur basically completely retarded but that is what you've 
>>>> been doing
>>>
>>> I've criticized some reconstructions of the ancient climate. That 
>>> doesn't mean I think they're all crap.
>>>
>>
>> yeah u criticized that which doesn't support your position, and 
>> apparently are directly admitting that you cherry pick that which does 
>> support your position ...
>>
>> even if the part you're arbitrarily deciding to "criticize" is a 
>> reconstruction of more recent history with inherently more data points 
>> in support of it
>>
>> u have literally zero idea what the fuck ur doing wilson, ideologues 
>> do be like that
>>
> Alright then, that should be a wrap. The unspoken truth, by consensus:
> 
> All informants on this list have zero idea what they are doing about 
> wildfires.
> 

glad to see ur starting to admit ur absolute ignorance dud

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃