Re: Private Property
Wilson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/9/2026 6:12 PM, dart200 wrote: > On 8/9/26 11:28 AM, Wilson wrote: >> On 8/9/2026 1:34 PM, dart200 wrote: >>> On 8/9/26 8:45 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>> >>>> At its core, free enterprise and a market economy can be reduced in >>>> many ways to an economic ideology centered around private property. >>>> It gives me extraordinary joy to see how our founders, in writing >>>> the Declaration of Independence, declared that all men were "endowed >>>> by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, among them are >>>> life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." >>>> >>>> Here, the founders took the natural rights John Locke wrote about in >>>> his Second Treatise of Government in 1690 – "lives, liberties, and >>>> estates, which I call by the general name, property," and broadened >>>> it. They presupposed that property was necessary for liberty and >>>> that the greater aspiration behind private property was "pursuit of >>>> happiness" (what we call "human flourishing" in my tradition). >>>> >>>> Just weeks before the Declaration of Independence was written, >>>> George Mason had codified in the Virginia Declaration of Rights that >>>> "the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and >>>> possessing property" were predicates to "pursuing and obtaining >>>> happiness and safety." The founding fathers were not waxing and >>>> waning philosophically – well, they were not /only/ doing that – >>>> they were expressing the lived experience of the settlers in the new >>>> world. >>>> >>>> The lived experience that served as the bedrock of our nation was >>>> one of private ownership driving incentives, of communal ownership >>>> discouraging productive work, and one where resentment was >>>> inevitable when rewards were equal, but effort was not. Communal >>>> ownership of property had failed in practice because it was first a >>>> failed theory. >>>> >>>> Private property is a natural right that flows from our ability to >>>> earn, hold, possess, retain, and manage the fruits of our own labor. >>>> It produces responsibility, stewardship, and abundance that align >>>> with human nature. >>>> >>>> David L. Bahnsen >>>> >>> >>> i love how capitalists love to jerk themselves off about freedom and >>> flourishing endlessly while ignoring the fact 7/8 are enslaved to a >>> nation-state system that coercively interferes with basic freedom of >>> movement >>> >>> this world is a travesty of authoritarian control all you can do is >>> keep crying endlessly about private property, as violently owning >>> stuff is the _only_ principle you actually care about >> >> Self-defense is not the initiation of violence, and as it is oriented >> towards the protection of life and the thriving of the human person, >> it is a natural human right. > > you are _not_ your property > >> >> Property as gained by the effort and work of a human being is >> inherently a part of that person's life. As such, defense of that >> property is also a human right. > > even the person who first came up with that predicated that right to > mixing labor with land to claim property, on there being enough common > lands left for all to utilize... > > which we've gone so far past that you want to keep 7/8 people on this > planet chained to the nation state they were born in without even the > permission to leave. > >> >> Anyone who attempts to take away one's property or other natural >> rights is an enabler of tyranny, and therefore an enemy of life and of >> humanity. I'm not keeping them in their home countries. They just can't all come here, that's all.