Re: Severe and ruthless
Dude <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/9/2026 9:37 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 17:55:10 -0700, dart200 > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 8/9/26 4:26 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 15:32:31 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/8/2026 7:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:43:08 -0000 (UTC), Tara <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 8, 2026 at 4:12:45?PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 12:27:31 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 8/5/2026 2:21 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>>>>>> NY Times, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> David Wallace-Wells >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "But for years Fauci has been bullied and harassed and intimidated >>>>>>>>> and, above all, vilified and scapegoated by bad faith critics mounting >>>>>>>>> contradictory attacks that allowed them to pin responsibility on one >>>>>>>>> man for everything they might not have liked about the experience of >>>>>>>>> living through a brutal pandemic. Yet that is exactly why Fauci should >>>>>>>>> have talked last week: to answer those critics, defend his approach >>>>>>>>> and those of his colleagues, and explain what lessons he?d learned and >>>>>>>>> might like the rest of us to learn. Evidently, he felt too boxed in to >>>>>>>>> try, even with Joe Biden?s blanket pardon in hand." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My assessment is that there is no sense in trying to defend and >>>>>>>>> explain to people who are determined to show you no quarter. Fauci >>>>>>>>> defended and explained in his book. Read it if want to understand. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "This is what it would mean to actually learn from the experience, >>>>>>>>> rather than treating the pandemic as a simplistic blame game. Instead, >>>>>>>>> we got Senator Bernie Moreno asking Fauci who he thought he was, >>>>>>>>> punctuating the rhetorical question with an expletive and a >>>>>>>>> burn-book-style digest of the contents of Fauci?s just-released >>>>>>>>> diary." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Treating it as a simplistic blame game. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is the essence of modern politics. It is the ultimate blame >>>>>>>>> game. The blame must all be on the other side. It must show them as >>>>>>>>> incompetent and unfit for office. Severe and ruthless must be the >>>>>>>>> assignment of that blame. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Learn from experience. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No David, any such lessons are beside the point which is only blame. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In conclusion, Daivd: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "The actual origin of the pandemic remains unknown, six years after >>>>>>>>> the country?s first confirmed case. Perhaps it always will be, >>>>>>>>> maddeningly enough, which may be one reason it?s so difficult to make >>>>>>>>> any collective and honest accounting of it. So much seems to hang on >>>>>>>>> the question of ultimate responsibility. But maybe if we can stop >>>>>>>>> trying to blame someone for Covid, we can actually learn something >>>>>>>>> from it." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So here is the image: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> David trying to be reasonable and thoughtful and Sen Moreno casting >>>>>>>>> fire and brimstone. Both sides essentially speaking to their >>>>>>>>> followers and nothing to each other, because there would be no point. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You failed to explain the case against Anthony Fauci. It's not just >>>>>>>> about the origin of the virus - it's all about the reaction to it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ron Paul is critical of Dr. Anthony Fauci because he views him as a >>>>>>>> primary architect of authoritarian government overreach, medical >>>>>>>> mandates, and public deception during the COVID-19 pandemic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As a physician and libertarian, Paul believes Fauci used exaggerated >>>>>>>> health data to justify destroying personal liberties. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes it is clear which side you choose. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why does it have to be about sides? It should always be only about the truth. >>>>>> And the truth is often complicated. >>>>> >>>>> As soon as you have decided what it all means you have chosen a side. >>>>> >>>> When you are a trucker, teacher or a soldier and you are being forced to >>>> wear a mask and/or get injected, or lose your job - that is where I draw >>>> the line. YMMV. >>> >>> When you refuse to protect the people around you by getting >>> vaccinated, that is where I draw the line. >> >> the endless cry from duds over vax, something which is highly tracked, >> and highly audited by multiple entities in a variety different orgs >> including many dedicated to human health is just endlessly incredible >> compared to the utter blindness they have towards the pollution from >> many other sectors that are far less regulated >> >> these fucks have such broken minds i really do think mortality is the >> only way their kind of ignorance will be resolved > > Netty cannot kill all the people who hate israel and: > There's no reason to bring racism into a conversation about Anthony Fauci. Even Fauci did not advocate forced vaccination of the public. > > Two things to eliminate crazy people: > 1) All crazy people die > 2) Huamns stop making babies > You forgot to mention murder and the holocaust as ways to eliminate people and also euthanasia and forced abortions. Some Neo-Nazi you turned out to be!