Re: on the unspoken truth about wildfires
dart200 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/11/26 9:54 AM, Dude wrote: > On 8/10/2026 12:40 PM, dart200 wrote: >> On 8/10/26 12:13 PM, Dude wrote: >>> On 8/9/2026 5:56 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>> On 8/9/26 3:43 PM, Dude wrote: >>>>> On 8/9/2026 3:19 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>> On 8/9/26 11:32 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/9/2026 2:04 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/9/26 6:23 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/8/2026 8:01 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/8/26 10:16 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 5:43 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:05:44 -0400, Wilson >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 14:22:46 -0400, Wilson >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There aren't a lot of studies that have tried to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconstruct temps over >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the past 10k years, but this chart comes from one that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> highly regarded: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0530-7/figures/3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, I think this graph shows exactly what I have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> been talking >>>>>>>>>>>>>> about. Look to the far right of the graph. Do you see >>>>>>>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>>>>>> alarming? For a better look, go to the close up view >>>>>>>>>>>>>> below the big >>>>>>>>>>>>>> graph. What do you see to the far right? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it looks to me to be not quite as high as the highest >>>>>>>>>>>>> estimated >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible temps from ~6k years ago. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think you are looking at that far right meteoric >>>>>>>>>>>> climb. You >>>>>>>>>>>> see the same effect here >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> where you can see the lia relative to recent temps. Are you >>>>>>>>>>>> still in >>>>>>>>>>>> denial? Of course you are. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Current temps are by most estimates about the same as 6kya. >>>>>>>>>>> Some will claim that we are higher now. Some say not quite as >>>>>>>>>>> high yet. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> yeah but wilson u don't even trust paleoclimatic >>>>>>>>>> reconstruction so what do u even know, eh? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You said this before and I don't know why. They are using >>>>>>>>> proxies, but I think the reconstructions do have value. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> because you've literally claimed multiple times now that u don't >>>>>>>> trust paleoclimatic reconstruction for the past century. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (cause you want to be able to keep denying that warming greatly >>>>>>>> accelerated in the 2nd half of the 20th century) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i get that ur basically completely retarded but that is what >>>>>>>> you've been doing >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've criticized some reconstructions of the ancient climate. That >>>>>>> doesn't mean I think they're all crap. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> yeah u criticized that which doesn't support your position, and >>>>>> apparently are directly admitting that you cherry pick that which >>>>>> does support your position ... >>>>>> >>>>>> even if the part you're arbitrarily deciding to "criticize" is a >>>>>> reconstruction of more recent history with inherently more data >>>>>> points in support of it >>>>>> >>>>>> u have literally zero idea what the fuck ur doing wilson, >>>>>> ideologues do be like that >>>>>> >>>>> Alright then, that should be a wrap. The unspoken truth, by consensus: >>>>> >>>>> All informants on this list have zero idea what they are doing >>>>> about wildfires. >>>>> >>>> >>>> glad to see ur starting to admit ur absolute ignorance dud >>>> >>> So, you're idea is to clean up brush in the boreal forest? >> >> my idea is that it's too labor/energy intensive to so do and therefore >> the forests will mostly burn down >> > That's one idea - just evacuate Quebec and let it burn itself out. where are they gunna move dud??? > The United States is actively helping Canada fight its wildfires. > Hundreds of U.S. firefighting personnel, state-level crews, such as from > New England and mid-Atlantic states. -- why are we god? let's end war 🙃