Re: on the unspoken truth about wildfires

On 8/11/2026 1:30 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/11/26 9:54 AM, Dude wrote:
>> On 8/10/2026 12:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/10/26 12:13 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>> On 8/9/2026 5:56 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/9/26 3:43 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/9/2026 3:19 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/9/26 11:32 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/9/2026 2:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/9/26 6:23 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/8/2026 8:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/8/26 10:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 5:43 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:05:44 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 14:22:46 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There aren't a lot of studies that have tried to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconstruct temps over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the past 10k years, but this chart comes from one that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> highly regarded:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0530-7/figures/3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, I think this graph shows exactly what I have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been talking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about.  Look to the far right of the graph.  Do you see 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alarming?  For a better look, go to the close up view 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below the big
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> graph.  What do you see to the far right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it looks to me to be not quite as high as the highest 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible temps from ~6k years ago.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think you are looking at that far right meteoric 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> climb. You
>>>>>>>>>>>>> see the same effect here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> where you can see the lia relative to recent temps.  Are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you still in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> denial?  Of course you are.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Current temps are by most estimates about the same as 6kya. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Some will claim that we are higher now. Some say not quite 
>>>>>>>>>>>> as high yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> yeah but wilson u don't even trust paleoclimatic 
>>>>>>>>>>> reconstruction so what do u even know, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You said this before and I don't know why. They are using 
>>>>>>>>>> proxies, but I think the reconstructions do have value.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> because you've literally claimed multiple times now that u 
>>>>>>>>> don't trust paleoclimatic reconstruction for the past century.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (cause you want to be able to keep denying that warming greatly 
>>>>>>>>> accelerated in the 2nd half of the 20th century)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i get that ur basically completely retarded but that is what 
>>>>>>>>> you've been doing
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've criticized some reconstructions of the ancient climate. 
>>>>>>>> That doesn't mean I think they're all crap.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yeah u criticized that which doesn't support your position, and 
>>>>>>> apparently are directly admitting that you cherry pick that which 
>>>>>>> does support your position ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> even if the part you're arbitrarily deciding to "criticize" is a 
>>>>>>> reconstruction of more recent history with inherently more data 
>>>>>>> points in support of it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> u have literally zero idea what the fuck ur doing wilson, 
>>>>>>> ideologues do be like that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alright then, that should be a wrap. The unspoken truth, by 
>>>>>> consensus:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All informants on this list have zero idea what they are doing 
>>>>>> about wildfires.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> glad to see ur starting to admit ur absolute ignorance dud
>>>>>
>>>> So, you're idea is to clean up brush in the boreal forest?
>>>
>>> my idea is that it's too labor/energy intensive to so do and 
>>> therefore the forests will mostly burn down
>>>
>> That's one idea - just evacuate Quebec and let it burn itself out.
> 
> where are they gunna move dud???
> 
They will be evacuated out of the boreal forest and let it burn down. 
There's not much an individual cam do.
 >
>> The United States is actively helping Canada fight its wildfires. 
>> Hundreds of U.S. firefighting personnel, state-level crews, such as 
>> from New England and mid-Atlantic states.
>