Re: on the unspoken truth about wildfires

On 8/11/26 5:13 PM, Dude wrote:
> On 8/11/2026 1:30 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/11/26 9:54 AM, Dude wrote:
>>> On 8/10/2026 12:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/10/26 12:13 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>> On 8/9/2026 5:56 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/9/26 3:43 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/9/2026 3:19 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/9/26 11:32 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/9/2026 2:04 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/9/26 6:23 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/8/2026 8:01 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/8/26 10:16 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 5:43 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 17:05:44 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/7/2026 4:19 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 14:22:46 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There aren't a lot of studies that have tried to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconstruct temps over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the past 10k years, but this chart comes from one that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> highly regarded:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0530-7/ 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> figures/3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, I think this graph shows exactly what I have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been talking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about.  Look to the far right of the graph.  Do you see 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alarming?  For a better look, go to the close up view 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below the big
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> graph.  What do you see to the far right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it looks to me to be not quite as high as the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> highest estimated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible temps from ~6k years ago.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think you are looking at that far right meteoric 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> climb. You
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see the same effect here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where you can see the lia relative to recent temps.  Are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you still in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> denial?  Of course you are.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current temps are by most estimates about the same as 6kya. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some will claim that we are higher now. Some say not quite 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as high yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> yeah but wilson u don't even trust paleoclimatic 
>>>>>>>>>>>> reconstruction so what do u even know, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You said this before and I don't know why. They are using 
>>>>>>>>>>> proxies, but I think the reconstructions do have value.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> because you've literally claimed multiple times now that u 
>>>>>>>>>> don't trust paleoclimatic reconstruction for the past century.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (cause you want to be able to keep denying that warming 
>>>>>>>>>> greatly accelerated in the 2nd half of the 20th century)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> i get that ur basically completely retarded but that is what 
>>>>>>>>>> you've been doing
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've criticized some reconstructions of the ancient climate. 
>>>>>>>>> That doesn't mean I think they're all crap.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> yeah u criticized that which doesn't support your position, and 
>>>>>>>> apparently are directly admitting that you cherry pick that 
>>>>>>>> which does support your position ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> even if the part you're arbitrarily deciding to "criticize" is a 
>>>>>>>> reconstruction of more recent history with inherently more data 
>>>>>>>> points in support of it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> u have literally zero idea what the fuck ur doing wilson, 
>>>>>>>> ideologues do be like that
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alright then, that should be a wrap. The unspoken truth, by 
>>>>>>> consensus:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All informants on this list have zero idea what they are doing 
>>>>>>> about wildfires.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> glad to see ur starting to admit ur absolute ignorance dud
>>>>>>
>>>>> So, you're idea is to clean up brush in the boreal forest?
>>>>
>>>> my idea is that it's too labor/energy intensive to so do and 
>>>> therefore the forests will mostly burn down
>>>>
>>> That's one idea - just evacuate Quebec and let it burn itself out.
>>
>> where are they gunna move dud???
>>
> They will be evacuated out of the boreal forest and let it burn down. 
> There's not much an individual cam do.

evacuated to where dud???

>>> The United States is actively helping Canada fight its wildfires. 
>>> Hundreds of U.S. firefighting personnel, state-level crews, such as 
>>> from New England and mid-Atlantic states.
>>
> 

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃