Re: Global Warming Alert

Dude <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/12/2026 2:25 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:20:53 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/11/2026 4:34 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 13:31:37 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/10/2026 8:32 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>> On 8/10/2026 2:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/10/26 2:20 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/8/2026 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>> America's Newspaper of Record:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Study Finds Possible Connection Between Current Heatwave And Giant
>>>>>>>> Flaming Orb In The Sky - Babylon Bee
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Droughts are absolutely not getting worse," says Lueken. "The media
>>>>>>> love to share stories when there is a drought somewhere, some
>>>>>>> specific location. They completely ignore previous years with record
>>>>>>> low amounts of drought."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hot Air:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Globally, there's been no increase in drought.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/277e78jf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the only "source" that "article" uses for counter claims:
>>>>>>
>>>>> The question is, has there been an increase in drought, or not?
>>>
>>> Who suggested there would be?  Climate change says that some dry areas
>>> will get wetter and some wet areas will get drier.  And the global
>>> average temperature will continue to rise towards 2 degrees C if not
>>> there already.  If so, then on to 2.5.
>> What happened to all those articles about widespread desertification due
>> to AGW?
> 
> Anthropogenic global warming or simply global warming.  From the
> beginning I have not heard about widespread desertification.  I did
> hear when it became clear that the phrase "global warming" was giving
> the people the wrong impression.  That would have been maybe 10 years
> ago or so.  So, it was decided to call it climate change which is more
> accurate predicting wetter dry places and drier wet places among
> various other effects.  That has been the story for a long time.  If
> your guys want to switch back to the wrong impression, that is to be
> expected of them, and that you would believe it also expected.
 >

I'm going with The Old Farmers Almanac:

Federal scientists report a greater than 90% chance that a "very strong" 
El Niño will develop and intensify through the fall and winter of 2026–27.

There is a 69% chance it could become a historic, record-setting event.

Wetter-than-average conditions are expected across parts of the South 
and California, raising flood and high sea-level risks, while northern 
regions trend drier.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.