Re: as an anarchist, i'm pretty disappointed with guns nuts ...

Wilson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/13/2026 8:49 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/13/26 1:52 PM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 8/13/2026 4:42 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/13/26 10:15 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "I'm not voting for anyone who thinks the wrong side won the Cold 
>>>> War or
>>>> cheers for the Intifada like it's the World Cup." - Bill Maher
>>>
>>> i'm not voting for anyone who doesn't think gun rights are universal 
>>> you stupid anti-freedom turd
>>
>>
>> How is it that you understand self-defense (which is the basis of gun 
>> rights) is a universal right but somehow /property/ does not rise to 
>> the same level?
> 
> because they aren't the same thing, and do not have the same properties
> 
> self-defense is inherently self-limiting to to oneself. unlike property 
> rights it does not expand arbitrarily. the unbounded expansions of 
> property rights, on the other hand, then can interfere with the basic 
> freedoms of others, whereas defense of one's actual self does not
> 
> nvm the fact that gun rights aren't even about self-defense like cons 
> endlessly bleat on about 🙄🙄🙄, that is best left to a legal/policing 
> system. gun rights are fundamentally about democratizing /common 
> defense/ against tyranny (both internally and externally), not "self- 
> defense"

Defending against a tyrannical government is just self defense.

> 
>>
>> Do you even ever think about the reality that guns are in fact property?
> 
> gun ownership is very much not zero-sum, unlike the kinds of property 
> ownership that can then interfere with the freedoms of others
> 
>>
>> Your belief system is a bundle of contradictions.
>>
> 
> u don't have something worthy of being called "a belief system", as it's 
> not established upon principles that u actually uphold generally
> 

So you see guns as being a special kind of property.

What if someone can't afford a gun? In that case it's pretty clear your 
ethics would require you to redistribute partial ownership of your gun 
to him. He can't afford to get one of his own so you need to share.

You should be glad to do it.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.