Re: Global Warming Alert

On 8/16/26 11:40 AM, Creon wrote:
> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:01:36 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And
>>>>>>>> near as I can tell it's only because:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. I've been wrong about something.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2. You don't agree with me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nice try asshole.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look
>>>>>> tougher.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely state
>>>>>>>> that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However,
>>>>>>> lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or innocent.
>>>>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
>>>>>>> propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, but
>>>>>>> you do not.  I am not inclined to be forgiving.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Even if love says you are limited by your ideological commitments. You
>>>>>>> are still smart enough to know better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing
>>>>>> judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know better,
>>>>>> that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart enough, it
>>>>>> can't be deliberate.
>>>>>
>>>>> nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence vs
>>>>> reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred
>>>>> narrative ...
>>>>
>>>> Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding what
>>>> makes sense.  Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
>>>
>>> my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of
>>> evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur
>>> stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
>>>
>>>> Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
>>>
>>> it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing to
>>> take responsibility for the godshit u preach
>>>
>>
>> You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather than
>> regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual insults &
>> semi-delusional rants.
> 
> He seems full-on delusional.
> 
> Earlier he was talking about "ownership of the means of healthcare
> production".  Um.......wat?
> 

shut up con, u don't actually read this group carefully

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃