Re: Global Warming Alert

On 8/16/26 11:58 AM, Wilson wrote:
> On 8/16/2026 2:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/16/26 11:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. And 
>>>>>>>>> near as I can tell it's only because:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. I've been wrong about something.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2. You don't agree with me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nice try asshole.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you look 
>>>>>>> tougher.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely 
>>>>>>>>> state that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any other.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However,
>>>>>>>> lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or 
>>>>>>>> innocent.
>>>>>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
>>>>>>>> propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know better, 
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> you do not.  I am not inclined to be forgiving.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even if love says you are limited by your ideological 
>>>>>>>> commitments. You
>>>>>>>> are still smart enough to know better.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and passing 
>>>>>>> judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know 
>>>>>>> better, that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being smart 
>>>>>>> enough, it can't be deliberate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept evidence 
>>>>>> vs reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to ur preferred 
>>>>>> narrative ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, deciding 
>>>>> what makes sense.  Versus swallowing whole everything told to you.
>>>>
>>>> my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body of 
>>>> evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence suits ur 
>>>> stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when it doesn't
>>>>
>>>>> Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
>>>>
>>>> it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to refusing 
>>>> to take responsibility for the godshit u preach
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather 
>>> than regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual 
>>> insults & semi-delusional rants.
>>>
>>
>> you haven't even bothered to refute the paleoclimatic facts yet u 
>> dumbass. if they are wrong, there should be some reason to not believe 
>> than, and such reason has not been provided ...
>>
>> ofc we both know u don't even remotely have the technical skill to do 
>> that. the gptslop you dumped out in lieu of actual ability was 
>> disgustingly pathetic
>>
> 
> You called some of the papers I did cite bogus, and couldn't even follow 
> the logic of why I interpreted one the way I did. As it's apparently 
> beyond you, why should I bother?
> 

u can't even cite the papers correct u dumbass

u literally tried to pass off a simulation attemp that the paper itself 
stated as obviously incomplete... as an actual hard paleoclimatic 
reconstruction

u don't even know what evidence even is ur so damn negligently caught up 
in ideological bullcrap

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃