Re: as an anarchist, i'm pretty disappointed with guns nuts ...
dart200 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/16/26 3:39 PM, Julian wrote: > On 16/08/2026 23:24, Tara wrote: >> Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 8/16/2026 3:39 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>> On 8/16/26 12:29 PM, Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 8/16/2026 3:02 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>> On 8/16/26 11:51 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:38 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 11:20 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:46 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 10:37 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:58 AM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/26 9:25 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/2026 5:34 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> i do advocate for _free_ guns u moron, so yes i do think we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should actively train and arm the population (to some high >>>>>>>>>>>>>> percentage). and i think we should do so on the taxpayers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dime because it's advantageous for the preservation of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty, to have a distributed the common defense against >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tyranny. we have than enough gun production to achieve this >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And who would be paying for the "free" guns and that training? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> progressive taxes, like how we pay for the military already dud >>>>>>>>>>> So you're counting on the government to fund the thing that will >>>>>>>>>>> stop the government if they get too despotic and authoritarian. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> state level taxes my dud, i don't think the federal govt even has >>>>>>>>>> the power to fund state militia. and yes, i expect having each >>>>>>>>>> state funding their own militia to be a robust enough protection >>>>>>>>>> against federal tyranny >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Okay. Good luck with that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i put every cop's and kid's death from guns squarely on the fucking >>>>>>>> retarded cons who refuse to deal with the massive liability that >>>>>>>> are gun rights >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> it's ur fault u evil motherfucker >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No one cares about your evil fantasies. >>>>>> >>>>>> YES, YOU DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT THE GUN DEATHS U EVIL MOTHERFUCKER >>>>> >>>>> I dont care about your evil fantasies. >>>> >>>> the guns deaths in country are far from fantasies u evil denialist fuck >>>> >>> >>> And you swallow the propaganda that it's law abiding people with guns >>> who are causing that death? >>> >>> >> >> If the bad guys didn’t have access to guns, the law abiding people >> wouldn’t >> need guns to protect them from the bad guys. >> Simplistic I know but that’s how it works in countries that restrict gun >> ownership. They just aren’t available for anyone, good or bad guys. >> (Unless >> in Canada’s case they’re smuggled across the border. :( but thats >> minimal.) >> Even if there was a ban on guns in the U S., the guns are already >> there and >> are an integrated part of your culture. >> >> I wonder if enough of the US population wanted a gun free country, it >> would >> be possible to have one. > > They'd have to shoot everyone, not necessarily kill but surely > incapacitate, who insisted in keeping their weapon. Besides, a > government with such power would be impossible to rein in on > less wholesome issues... say enough people wanted a Jew free > country. ofc joolian brings a joo to the gunfight 🙄 -- why are we god? let's end war 🙃