Re: Global Warming Alert
Wilson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote: > At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. >>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm >>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think >>>>>> you're just repeating what your media told you, things that >>>>>> tickle your preset biases. >>>>>> >>>>>> So it goes. >>>>> What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to >>>>> >>>>> Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the >>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an >>>>> attack and not something else, and that election fraud might >>>>> happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That >>>>> is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute >>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him. >>>>> >>>>> I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does >>>>> not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into >>>>> the depths of delusion. >>>> >>>> You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what >>>> you're standing on. >>> And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you >>> don't we have been over this stuff so many times. >> >> Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me >> the same way. > > I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you > "learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns. In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with the whole state. > > That's just one item that you were corrected on. I wonder how > many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory > banks. > At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.