Re: as an anarchist, i'm pretty disappointed with guns nuts ...
Creon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Unnamed Newswriter |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:57:48 -0700, dart200 <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/16/26 12:25 PM, Creon wrote: > > At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 12:02:49 -0700, dart200 > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 8/16/26 11:51 AM, Wilson wrote: > >>> On 8/16/2026 2:38 PM, dart200 wrote: > >>>> On 8/16/26 11:20 AM, Wilson wrote: > >>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:46 PM, dart200 wrote: > >>>>>> On 8/16/26 10:37 AM, Wilson wrote: > >>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:58 AM, dart200 wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 8/15/26 9:25 AM, Wilson wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 8/14/2026 5:34 PM, dart200 wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/26 9:38 AM, Wilson wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/13/2026 8:49 PM, dart200 wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/13/26 1:52 PM, Wilson wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you even ever think about the reality that guns are > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in fact property? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> gun ownership is very much not zero-sum, unlike the > >>>>>>>>>>>> kinds of property ownership that can then interfere with > >>>>>>>>>>>> the freedoms of others > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Your belief system is a bundle of contradictions. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> u don't have something worthy of being called "a belief > >>>>>>>>>>>> system", as it's not established upon principles that u > >>>>>>>>>>>> actually uphold generally > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> So you see guns as being a special kind of property. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> What if someone can't afford a gun? In that case it's > >>>>>>>>>>> pretty clear your ethics would require you to > >>>>>>>>>>> redistribute partial ownership of your gun to him. He > >>>>>>>>>>> can't afford to get one of his own so you need to share. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> You should be glad to do it. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> i do advocate for _free_ guns u moron, so yes i do think > >>>>>>>>>> we should actively train and arm the population (to some > >>>>>>>>>> high percentage). and i think we should do so on the > >>>>>>>>>> taxpayers dime because it's advantageous for the > >>>>>>>>>> preservation of liberty, to have a distributed the common > >>>>>>>>>> defense against tyranny. we have than enough gun > >>>>>>>>>> production to achieve this > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> And who would be paying for the "free" guns and that > >>>>>>>>> training? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> progressive taxes, like how we pay for the military already > >>>>>>>> dud > >>>>>>> So you're counting on the government to fund the thing that > >>>>>>> will stop the government if they get too despotic and > >>>>>>> authoritarian. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> state level taxes my dud, i don't think the federal govt even > >>>>>> has the power to fund state militia. and yes, i expect having > >>>>>> each state funding their own militia to be a robust enough > >>>>>> protection against federal tyranny > >>>>> > >>>>> Okay. Good luck with that. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> i put every cop's and kid's death from guns squarely on the > >>>> fucking retarded cons who refuse to deal with the massive > >>>> liability that are gun rights > >>>> > >>>> it's ur fault u evil motherfucker > >>>> > >>> > >>> No one cares about your evil fantasies. > >>> > >> > >> YES, YOU DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT THE GUN DEATHS U EVIL > >> MOTHERFUCKER > > > > https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RulesOfTheInternet > > > > Rule 39: CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL. > > Rule 40: EVEN WITH CRUISE CONTROL YOU STILL HAVE TO STEER > > > > A simple syllogism: > > > > 1) Self-defense is a human right. > > 2) Bad guys have deadly weapons. > > Therefore: > > 3) Good guys also have deadly weapons. > > > > Because out at the ranch: When seconds count, the sheriff is > > minutes away. > > > > moronic arguments like this are why u lump you in with the rest of the > cons festering in the shitshow of ignorance that is this group Since you have no counter to my argument, you attempt a blatant ad hominem logical fallacy. Study logic. Please. If not for your sake, then for posterity's sake -- you're embarrassing yourself, and future descendants. -- -c System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G OS: Linux 7.2.0-rc7 D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Ti (24G) (610.57.04) "Don't thank me for insulting you. It was my pleasure..."