Re: as an anarchist, i'm pretty disappointed with guns nuts ...

Creon <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic
Organization The Unnamed Newswriter
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 22:24:45 -0000 (UTC), Tara <[email protected]> wrote:

> Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 8/16/2026 3:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >> On 8/16/26 12:29 PM, Wilson wrote:
> >>> On 8/16/2026 3:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>> On 8/16/26 11:51 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:38 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>> On 8/16/26 11:20 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:46 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 10:37 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:58 AM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/26 9:25 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/2026 5:34 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> i do advocate for _free_ guns u moron, so yes i do think
> >>>>>>>>>>>> we should actively train and arm the population (to some
> >>>>>>>>>>>> high percentage). and i think we should do so on the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> taxpayers dime because it's advantageous for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> preservation of liberty, to have a distributed the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> common defense against tyranny. we have than enough gun
> >>>>>>>>>>>> production to achieve this
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> And who would be paying for the "free" guns and that
> >>>>>>>>>>> training?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> progressive taxes, like how we pay for the military
> >>>>>>>>>> already dud
> >>>>>>>>> So you're counting on the government to fund the thing that
> >>>>>>>>> will stop the government if they get too despotic and
> >>>>>>>>> authoritarian.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> state level taxes my dud, i don't think the federal govt
> >>>>>>>> even has the power to fund state militia. and yes, i expect
> >>>>>>>> having each state funding their own militia to be a robust
> >>>>>>>> enough protection against federal tyranny
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Okay. Good luck with that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> i put every cop's and kid's death from guns squarely on the
> >>>>>> fucking retarded cons who refuse to deal with the massive
> >>>>>> liability that are gun rights
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> it's ur fault u evil motherfucker
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No one cares about your evil fantasies.
> >>>>
> >>>> YES, YOU DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT THE GUN DEATHS U EVIL
> >>>> MOTHERFUCKER
> >>>
> >>> I dont care about your evil fantasies.
> >>
> >> the guns deaths in country are far from fantasies u evil denialist
> >> fuck
> >>
> >
> > And you swallow the propaganda that it's law abiding people with
> > guns who are causing that death?
> >
> >
>
> If the bad guys didn’t have access to guns, the law abiding people
> wouldn’t need guns to protect them from the bad guys.

So a bad guy attacks with a knife instead.  What does Mother Jones
use to defend herself?

It's called an "equalizer".

In the UK, you can't even walk down the street with a lockblade
in your pocket.

> Simplistic I
> know but that’s how it works in countries that restrict gun
> ownership.

There are still deadly weapons, they just need more skill/muscle
to operate.

> They just aren’t available for anyone, good or bad guys.
> (Unless in Canada’s case they’re smuggled across the border. :( but
> thats minimal.) Even if there was a ban on guns in the U S., the guns
> are already there and are an integrated part of your culture.
>
> I wonder if enough of the US population wanted a gun free country, it
> would be possible to have one.

Beats me.

-- 
-c System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G
   OS: Linux 7.2.0-rc7 D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
   NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Ti (24G) (610.57.04)
   "Predestination was doomed from the start."
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.