Re: Global Warming Alert
Dude <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/16/2026 7:25 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: > On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 19:30:41 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote: >>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological. >>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm >>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think >>>>>>>> you're just repeating what your media told you, things that >>>>>>>> tickle your preset biases. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So it goes. >>>>>>> What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the >>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an >>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election fraud might >>>>>>> happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us. That >>>>>>> is a sample. The list is long, including attempts to prosecute >>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit. That does >>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief. But it sure does sink you into >>>>>>> the depths of delusion. >>>>>> >>>>>> You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what >>>>>> you're standing on. >>>>> And you have nothing to say about my list above. Of course you >>>>> don't we have been over this stuff so many times. >>>> >>>> Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me >>>> the same way. >>> >>> I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you >>> "learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns. >> >> In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember >> where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy with >> the whole state. >> >>> >>> That's just one item that you were corrected on. I wonder how >>> many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory >>> banks. >>> >> >> At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong. > Except when it matters > Like himbo is a wannbe dictator > Jan 6 was an actual attack on the electoral vote count > etc. > Let's not forget the opinions expressed by informants are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of all Usenet subscribers.