Re: Global Warming Alert

On 8/17/26 10:08 AM, Dude wrote:
> On 8/16/2026 7:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/16/26 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
>>> On 8/16/2026 4:30 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
>>>>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
>>>>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
>>>>>>>>>> you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
>>>>>>>>>> tickle your preset biases.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So it goes.
>>>>>>>>> What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
>>>>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
>>>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
>>>>>>>>> happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us.   That
>>>>>>>>> is a sample.  The list is long, including attempts to prosecute
>>>>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit.  That does
>>>>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief.  But it sure does sink you into
>>>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
>>>>>>>> you're standing on.
>>>>>>> And you have nothing to say about my list above.  Of course you
>>>>>>> don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
>>>>>> the same way.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
>>>>> "learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
>>>>
>>>> In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't remember 
>>>> where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that policy 
>>>> with the whole state.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's just one item that you were corrected on.  I wonder how
>>>>> many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
>>>>> banks.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
>>>>
>>> Let's not forget we're dialoging with a guy who believes the Jews 
>>> attacked the WTC on 9/11 and brought down the WTC-7 with explosives 
>>> planted on the inside.
>>
>> let's not forget 7/8ths of the planet is chained to their nation 
>> states because psychos like you want to live in an fake illusion of 
>> general prosperity
>>
> Let's not forget that 99.9% of all people on earth live in nation 
> states. Only a very tiny minority are stateless.

is this supposed to justify violating basic freedom of movement for 
7/8ths people on the planet???

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃