Re: Global Warming Alert

On 8/17/2026 6:55 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:25:36 +0000, "Doc Hammerslack"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:32:05 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/17/2026 12:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/17/26 10:08 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>> On 8/16/2026 7:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:30 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickle your preset biases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us.   That
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a sample.  The list is long, including attempts to prosecute
>>>>>>>>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit.  That does
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief.  But it sure does sink you into
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
>>>>>>>>>>>> you're standing on.
>>>>>>>>>>> And you have nothing to say about my list above.  Of course you
>>>>>>>>>>> don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
>>>>>>>>>> the same way.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
>>>>>>>>> "learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't
>>>>>>>> remember where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that
>>>>>>>> policy with the whole state.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's just one item that you were corrected on.  I wonder how
>>>>>>>>> many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
>>>>>>>>> banks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's not forget we're dialoging with a guy who believes the Jews
>>>>>>> attacked the WTC on 9/11 and brought down the WTC-7 with explosives
>>>>>>> planted on the inside.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> let's not forget 7/8ths of the planet is chained to their nation
>>>>>> states because psychos like you want to live in an fake illusion of
>>>>>> general prosperity
>>>>>>
>>>>> Let's not forget that 99.9% of all people on earth live in nation
>>>>> states. Only a very tiny minority are stateless.
>>>>
>>>> is this supposed to justify violating basic freedom of movement for
>>>> 7/8ths people on the planet???
>>>>
>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
>>
>> What weenerbrane is describing would be some kind of "even newer
>> world order".
> 
> You missed the double whammy, doc.  At the same time as he accuses us
> of wanting open borders, he also implies that the us is a welfare
> state.  And then he implies that all immigrants come for us welfare.
> What, they are all unemployable single mothers?  And they want to live
> on not enough to pay rent?
>
You can't have open borders in a welfare state.

"The core premise is that free immigration combined with an open-access 
system of public benefits creates a mathematical and fiscal paradox that 
ultimately leads to economic collapse or the destruction of social 
safety nets.' - Milton Friedman
 >

> That is probably the most decrepit underhanded low down logic free
> dirty accusation ever.
> 
You came here to get enlightened?


 >
>> Name one country that doesn't check your passport when you cross
>> a border.  (They might allow that in the EU, but not even sure
>> about that.)