Re: Global Warming Alert

On 8/17/26 7:00 PM, Dude wrote:
> On 8/16/2026 12:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/16/26 12:25 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 8/16/2026 3:13 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/16/26 11:58 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/26 11:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 6:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 4:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/26 11:46 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 1:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 12:39:24 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't count the number of times you've called me a liar. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And near as I can tell it's only because:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I've been wrong about something.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. You don't agree with me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice try asshole.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No one cares when you say that, Noah. It does not make you 
>>>>>>>>>>> look tougher.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither of those two things are a lie. And I can absolutely 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> state that I've never deliberately lied on this ng or any 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> However,
>>>>>>>>>>>> lies are not opinions or ideas, or notions, or guesses, or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> innocent.
>>>>>>>>>>>> lies are deliberate, you might not know when you are reciting
>>>>>>>>>>>> propaganda, but you should, you are smart enough to know 
>>>>>>>>>>>> better, but
>>>>>>>>>>>> you do not.  I am not inclined to be forgiving.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if love says you are limited by your ideological 
>>>>>>>>>>>> commitments. You
>>>>>>>>>>>> are still smart enough to know better.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sitting up there on your throne of beliefs, surveying and 
>>>>>>>>>>> passing judgement on the benighted plebs that surround you.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm reciting propaganda but am not smart enough to know 
>>>>>>>>>>> better, that's not lying. And if it's a case of not being 
>>>>>>>>>>> smart enough, it can't be deliberate.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> nah, when ur deliberately cherry-picking when to accept 
>>>>>>>>>> evidence vs reject it based on trying to fit that evidence to 
>>>>>>>>>> ur preferred narrative ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Using discernment to see what seems to fit reality best, 
>>>>>>>>> deciding what makes sense.  Versus swallowing whole everything 
>>>>>>>>> told to you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> my dumbass retarded nigga, ur doing it with _with the same body 
>>>>>>>> of evidence_ ... ei magically accepting it when the evidence 
>>>>>>>> suits ur stupefyingly denialist narrative, and rejecting it when 
>>>>>>>> it doesn't
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yeah I can see how that's confusing for you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it's not confusing, ur just willfully lying because due to 
>>>>>>>> refusing to take responsibility for the godshit u preach
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're always free to refute what I say with actual facts, rather 
>>>>>>> than regurgitating the regime narrative bolstered by your usual 
>>>>>>> insults & semi-delusional rants.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you haven't even bothered to refute the paleoclimatic facts yet u 
>>>>>> dumbass. if they are wrong, there should be some reason to not 
>>>>>> believe than, and such reason has not been provided ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ofc we both know u don't even remotely have the technical skill to 
>>>>>> do that. the gptslop you dumped out in lieu of actual ability was 
>>>>>> disgustingly pathetic
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You called some of the papers I did cite bogus, and couldn't even 
>>>>> follow the logic of why I interpreted one the way I did. As it's 
>>>>> apparently beyond you, why should I bother?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> u can't even cite the papers correct u dumbass
>>>>
>>>> u literally tried to pass off a simulation attemp that the paper 
>>>> itself stated as obviously incomplete... as an actual hard 
>>>> paleoclimatic reconstruction
>>>>
>>>> u don't even know what evidence even is ur so damn negligently 
>>>> caught up in ideological bullcrap
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nick: "blah, blah, blah, everyone who's not me is stupid..."
>>>
>>
>> i nowhere tried to utilize that kind of argument, i specifically 
>> detailed how you were full of shit wilson. 
>  >
> That's a wrap. Good work. You wrapped up the Global Warming discussion. 
> Brilliant!
>  >
> u unfortunately are not
>> capable of recognizing evdience
>>
> It is impossible to prove a negative. The burden of proof is on you: 

yes it is. u can prove the world is not warming by showing how the temps 
aren't rising and/or how the input/output energy fluxes are balanced out

neither do u know what evidence is, nor do u know how to argue

> global warming. Go!
> 
> Note:
> 
> The person making a claim about a hidden or new thing carries the duty 
> to show it, rather than forcing others to chase an infinite shadow.

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃