Re: Global Warming Alert

On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 19:18:41 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 8/17/2026 6:55 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:25:36 +0000, "Doc Hammerslack"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:32:05 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/17/2026 12:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/17/26 10:08 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 7:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:30 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being ideological.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think you're dealing in the realm of truthiness while I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a lot of times I think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're just repeating what your media told you, things that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickle your preset biases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo, and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots was in fact an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that election fraud might
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen once in a while but it is not a problem in the us.   That
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a sample.  The list is long, including attempts to prosecute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> himbo's critics and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit.  That does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not put me on throne of belief.  But it sure does sink you into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see that's what
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're standing on.
>>>>>>>>>>>> And you have nothing to say about my list above.  Of course you
>>>>>>>>>>>> don't we have been over this stuff so many times.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and you see me
>>>>>>>>>>> the same way.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which you
>>>>>>>>>> "learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't
>>>>>>>>> remember where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated that
>>>>>>>>> policy with the whole state.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's just one item that you were corrected on.  I wonder how
>>>>>>>>>> many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your memory
>>>>>>>>>> banks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's not forget we're dialoging with a guy who believes the Jews
>>>>>>>> attacked the WTC on 9/11 and brought down the WTC-7 with explosives
>>>>>>>> planted on the inside.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> let's not forget 7/8ths of the planet is chained to their nation
>>>>>>> states because psychos like you want to live in an fake illusion of
>>>>>>> general prosperity
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's not forget that 99.9% of all people on earth live in nation
>>>>>> states. Only a very tiny minority are stateless.
>>>>>
>>>>> is this supposed to justify violating basic freedom of movement for
>>>>> 7/8ths people on the planet???
>>>>>
>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
>>>
>>> What weenerbrane is describing would be some kind of "even newer
>>> world order".
>> 
>> You missed the double whammy, doc.  At the same time as he accuses us
>> of wanting open borders, he also implies that the us is a welfare
>> state.  And then he implies that all immigrants come for us welfare.
>> What, they are all unemployable single mothers?  And they want to live
>> on not enough to pay rent?
>>
>You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
>
>"The core premise is that free immigration combined with an open-access 
>system of public benefits creates a mathematical and fiscal paradox that 
>ultimately leads to economic collapse or the destruction of social 
>safety nets.' - Milton Friedman

Good job repeating yourself.  Do it again, just for grins.  Mine of
course.

>
>> That is probably the most decrepit underhanded low down logic free
>> dirty accusation ever.
>> 
>You came here to get enlightened?
>
>
> >
>>> Name one country that doesn't check your passport when you cross
>>> a border.  (They might allow that in the EU, but not even sure
>>> about that.)
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away