Re: Why the Left Needed to Believe in Jason Arday
Noah Sombrero <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Noah's Kitchen |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 11:50:53 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > >Jason Arday was either the most interesting man in the world, or he was >a liar. It turned out to be the latter. Why the right needs to continue whipping this man even though he is quite demonstrably dead. >All this has revealed many unflattering things about academia: DEI >invites fraud by lowering standards, the bigotry of low expectations is >alive and well, and a disturbing number of Âexperts  not just Arday >but all the Cambridge professors and BBC journalists who co-signed him  >are compromised by ideology, cowardice, or both. > >But the Arday scandal has also revealed something else: White liberals >in the English-speaking world want to believe in the archetype of the >up-from-nothing black intellectual who, despite huge disadvantages, goes >on to achieve greatness. In fact, they want to believe in this sort of >story so badly that they are willing to turn off every ounce of >skepticism that they would normally bring to bear on fantastical claims. > >The irony, however, is that we already have many examples of >up-from-nothing black intellectuals who go on to greatness. ItÂs just >that they usually turn out to be conservatives  or if not >conservatives, then at least out-of-step with the left-wing religion of >racial justice. > >Consider Thomas Sowell. Sowell was born in the Jim Crow South and grew >up in a house without hot water or electricity. His father died before >he was born, and his mother died soon after. As a teenager, he did a >brief stint in a homeless shelter, sleeping with a knife under his >pillow. Years later, he somehow managed to make it to Harvard >UniversityÂbefore affirmative action existed to cast a doubt over such >achievementsÂand he began what would become one of the great >intellectual careers in modern American history. > >Or think of Roland Fryer. Fryer was abandoned at birth by his mother. >His father, meanwhile, was an abusive, gambling alcoholic who ended up >in prison for rape. He also spent quite a bit of time with his >great-aunt and cousins, who ran a major crack cocaine operation. Perhaps >unsurprisingly, by his teenage years, Fryer was involved in petty crime. >Yet he managed to get into college on an athletic scholarship and then >caught the economics bug. He would go on to become an award-winning >economics professor at Harvard. > >Or consider Glenn Loury. Loury grew up in a redlined, working-class >neighborhood on the South Side of Chicago in the 1950s. During his >teens, he fathered two children, and supported them by working in a >printing plantÂall while taking classes at a community college. >Eventually, he worked his way up to MIT, where he earned a PhD. And >despite his later crack cocaine addiction, Loury went on to an >illustrious career as an economist and political commentator. > >In an alternate reality, Sowell, Fryer, and Loury would be heroes of the >left, just like Jason Arday was until his downfall. After all, it is the >left and not the right that frequently talks about Âcentering black >voices. But thereÂs one problem. Though progressives would never say >this out loud, people like Sowell, Fryer, and Loury donÂt serve the >purpose for which black intellectuals are intended, which is not to >advance research or fight for the interests of black people but rather >to scratch a very specific psychological itch in the white liberal psyche. > >In the progressive mind, white people are forever the problem and need >to be told that purging the racism within their hearts is the key to >black advancement. Black intellectuals who ritualistically affirm this >belief  people like Ta-Nehisi Coates, Ibram X. Kendi, and Nikole >Hannah-Jones  are useful. They are serving their intended purpose. >Black intellectuals who donÂt do this are not just useless; they are an >active threat to the white guilt complex. > >Sowell, for example, has spent his career arguing, quite persuasively, >that discrimination is not the only possible cause of racial disparities >and that culture matters a great deal, too. Fryer has argued, again >persuasively, that American police departments are no likelier to use >deadly force on black suspects than on suspects who arenÂt black; that >Justice Department pattern-or-practice investigations into police >agencies (often favored by Democratic administrations) cause an increase >in violent crime, which hurts the black community most; and that the >Âacting white penalty imposed by the black community on its own members >is a real thing. Loury, for his part, has a long-running podcast with >John McWhorter (a self-described Âcranky liberal DemocratÂ) that has >featured some of the best criticisms of woke racial politics out there. > >So with all of the genuinely inspiring black intellectuals rendered >useless by their stubborn independence of mind, who is left to scratch >this guilty itch in the liberal psyche? Well, it would seem that the >second string has had to suffice. And thatÂs where the Jason Ardays of >the world come in. It should go without saying that ArdayÂs death is a >terrible tragedy that no one should celebrate. At the same time, it is >true to say that this tragedy was enabled by the psychological need >among liberal elites for a black avatar of their guilt. > >ArdayÂs death should be a call for liberals and progressives to look >inward  not to expunge the supposed demon of white supremacy, but to >look at the nature of white guilt itself. Ultimately, white guilt is a >virus that leads its victims to prioritize their own need for catharsis >over the publicÂs need for truth. The moment that elites in the West >have this much-needed epiphany en masse will be the moment that we >ensure the tragic case of Jason Arday never repeats itself. > >Coleman Hughes -- Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain Don't get political with me young man or I'll tie you to a railroad track and <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>> Who dares to talk to El Sombrero? dares: Ned does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away