Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On 8/18/26 5:54 PM, Creon wrote:
> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 8/16/2026 10:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:24 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's
>>>>>>>> basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly
>>>>>>>> narratives from croaking out completely
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and
>>>>>>>> capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic
>>>>>>>> freedom on this planet
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
>>>>>> i'm sorry... why can't you have a global welfare state?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> rhetorical question dud: it's because capitalism hasn't been
>>>>>> prosperous enough
>>>>>>
>>>>>> basically we have closed borders and shit on the basic freedom of 7/8
>>>>>> of the total global population because capitalism needs to maintain
>>>>>> it's ungodly stupid narrative of "general prosperity"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    > you people are fucking psychos tbh
>>>>>>    >
>>>>>>    > #god
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live there.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who
>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their
>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in
>>>>> with the
>>>>
>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, they
>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u fucking
>>>> racist tard
>>>>
>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would)
>>>>> destroy their nation.
>>>>
>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% latino, 5%
>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our
>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to
>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact people
>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the residents who
>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>>>
>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on this
>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh feeeelz" you
>>>> inhumane prick
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that would be
>>>>> destroyed.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic
>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much of a
>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would
>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>>>
>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing Putin
>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
>>
>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, wilson.
> 
> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply
> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
> 
> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
> 

creon is correct about that ad absurdum is a valid argument style, the 
term noah was looking for is slippery slope fallacy

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃