Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?
Noah Sombrero <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Noah's Kitchen |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:54:33 +0000, Creon <[email protected]> wrote: >At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote: >> >> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote: >> >>> On 8/16/2026 10:39 PM, dart200 wrote: >> >>>> On 8/16/26 7:24 PM, Dude wrote: >> >>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:40 PM, dart200 wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's >> >>>>>> basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly >> >>>>>> narratives from croaking out completely >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> 7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and >> >>>>>> capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic >> >>>>>> freedom on this planet >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state. >> >>>> i'm sorry... why can't you have a global welfare state? >> >>>> >> >>>> rhetorical question dud: it's because capitalism hasn't been >> >>>> prosperous enough >> >>>> >> >>>> basically we have closed borders and shit on the basic freedom of 7/8 >> >>>> of the total global population because capitalism needs to maintain >> >>>> it's ungodly stupid narrative of "general prosperity" >> >>>> >> >>>> Â Â > you people are fucking psychos tbh >> >>>> Â Â > >> >>>> Â Â > #god >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live there. >> >>> >> >>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who >> >>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their >> >>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in >> >>> with the >> >> >> >> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, they >> >> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u fucking >> >> racist tard >> >> >> >>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would) >> >>> destroy their nation. >> >> >> >> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% latino, 5% >> >> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our >> >> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to >> >> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact people >> >> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself... >> >> >> >>> >> >>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the residents who >> >>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!". >> >> >> >> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on this >> >> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh feeeelz" you >> >> inhumane prick >> >> >> >>> >> >>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that would be >> >>> destroyed. >> >>> >> >> >> >> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic >> >> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much of a >> >> fragile pile of godshit eh? >> >> >> > >> >It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would >> >apply if all of the people were white or any other race. >> > >> >What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing Putin >> >wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines? >> >> Fallacy alert: ad absurdum. You really gotta cut that out, wilson. > >Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply >because there are colloquial Latin names for them. > >An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid. Extending a proposition to the point where it is obviously absurd is valid? I don't think so. Sending 4 million immigrants to a small island is a proper parallel for us immigration? Nope. I don't buy it. That argument is absurd. -- Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain Don't get political with me young man or I'll tie you to a railroad track and <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>> Who dares to talk to El Sombrero? dares: Ned does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away