Re: Global Warming Alert

On 8/18/26 6:06 PM, Creon wrote:
> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 20:39:11 -0700, dart200
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/17/26 5:25 PM, Doc Hammerslack wrote:
>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:32:05 -0700, Dude <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/17/2026 12:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/17/26 10:08 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 7:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:30 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs as being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideological. You think you're dealing in the realm of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truthiness while I'm just repeating propaganda. And
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tbh, a lot of times I think you're just repeating what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your media told you, things that tickle your preset
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> biases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What it comes down to is that I say, when you refusal to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Know that the 2020 election was not stolen from himbo,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the attack on the attempt to count electoral ballots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was in fact an attack and not something else, and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election fraud might happen once in a while but it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not a problem in the us.   That is a sample.  The list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is long, including attempts to prosecute himbo's critics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and pardon criminals who do not criticize him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I say that refusal to know is self evident bull shit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not put me on throne of belief.  But it sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does sink you into the depths of delusion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're so high on your own beliefs you can't even see
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's what you're standing on.
>>>>>>>>>>>> And you have nothing to say about my list above.  Of
>>>>>>>>>>>> course you don't we have been over this stuff so many
>>>>>>>>>>>> times.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest debater and
>>>>>>>>>>> you see me the same way.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm still wondering if you trust the news source from which
>>>>>>>>>> you "learned" that California didn't allow controlled burns.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In context some areas do restrict controlled burns. I don't
>>>>>>>>> remember where I saw it and maybe I was the one who conflated
>>>>>>>>> that policy with the whole state.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's just one item that you were corrected on.  I wonder
>>>>>>>>>> how many other "facts" of that provenence you hold in your
>>>>>>>>>> memory banks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's not forget we're dialoging with a guy who believes the
>>>>>>>> Jews attacked the WTC on 9/11 and brought down the WTC-7 with
>>>>>>>> explosives planted on the inside.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> let's not forget 7/8ths of the planet is chained to their
>>>>>>> nation states because psychos like you want to live in an fake
>>>>>>> illusion of general prosperity
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's not forget that 99.9% of all people on earth live in nation
>>>>>> states. Only a very tiny minority are stateless.
>>>>>
>>>>> is this supposed to justify violating basic freedom of movement
>>>>> for 7/8ths people on the planet???
>>>>>
>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
>>>
>>> What weenerbrane is describing would be some kind of "even newer
>>> world order".
>>>
>>> Name one country that doesn't check your passport when you cross
>>> a border.  (They might allow that in the EU, but not even sure
>>> about that.)
>>>
>>
>> yes were
> 
> It's "we're", and TINW.

🥱🥱🥱 there is a "we" that describes commonly held beliefs, ur just not 
that special of snowflake creon. especially given that you accept 
violating basic freedom of movement because "everyone else is doing it 
too". which is literally ur argument given that you brought up the fact 
that all countries check passports at some level.

ur just presenting a bandwagon fallacy. just because we're all 
normalized to the fucking passport checking bandwagon does not imply 
anything particularly good about that bandwagon as it stands.

> 
>> so normalized to shitting all over basic freedom of
>> movement, to point where 7/8 people on this planet are chained to
>> their nation state without any choice in the matter, we should just
>> keep doing it...
>>
>> just like we should have just kept around slavery, eh???
> 
> What the hell kind of argument is that (besides a non sequitur)?

ur argument was that because all countries check passports therefore 
this isn't a massive violation of ethics...

i drew an analogy to the fact that all countries use to allow for 
slavery, and that did not detract from the fact it was a massive 
violation of ethics

i'm not really sure why u didn't pick up on that but given ur level of 
argument it's not that surprising u needed it more spelled out

> 
>> it's funny u think this shitshow of a subethical species even deserves
>> sustainability. but the jokes truly on me cause most of u chucklefucks
>> have ur head shoved so far up ur asshole u can't even admit there's a
>> problem
>>
>>    > cause it would completely break the fragile ideology u preach
>>    >
>>    > #god
>>
>> cons and not wanting to study things cause they can't handle the
>> truth: name a more iconic duo
> 
> How many countries have you travelled to, O master of passport?
> 

if u read this group with any amount of depth you'd know i lived for 
almost 4 years in the philippines ... heck i just mentioned that today 
here acktually

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃