Re: Why the Left Needed to Believe in Jason Arday
Noah Sombrero <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Noah's Kitchen |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 17:14:00 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote: >On 8/18/2026 12:23 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 11:50:53 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Jason Arday was either the most interesting man in the world, or he was >>> a liar. It turned out to be the latter. >> >> Why the right needs to continue whipping this man even though he is >> quite demonstrably dead. >> You just came here and whipped on Jason Arday, again - even though he is >quite demonstrably dead! > >For God's sake, you're talking about a guy that got diagnosed autistic >at age 3! > >And was non-verbal until 11, and had partial deafness in one ear and so >was taught to sign but couldn't read until 18, but still left school >with two upper level degrees and was a pro snooker player at age 10, one >year before he could even speak! > >And, you believed him. He remains dead. It would be respectful if you would stop digging him up and hitting him with hammers. > > >> All this has revealed many unflattering things about academia: DEI >>> invites fraud by lowering standards, the bigotry of low expectations is >>> alive and well, and a disturbing number of Âexperts  not just Arday >>> but all the Cambridge professors and BBC journalists who co-signed him  >>> are compromised by ideology, cowardice, or both. >>> >>> But the Arday scandal has also revealed something else: White liberals >>> in the English-speaking world want to believe in the archetype of the >>> up-from-nothing black intellectual who, despite huge disadvantages, goes >>> on to achieve greatness. In fact, they want to believe in this sort of >>> story so badly that they are willing to turn off every ounce of >>> skepticism that they would normally bring to bear on fantastical claims. >>> >>> The irony, however, is that we already have many examples of >>> up-from-nothing black intellectuals who go on to greatness. ItÂs just >>> that they usually turn out to be conservatives  or if not >>> conservatives, then at least out-of-step with the left-wing religion of >>> racial justice. >>> >>> Consider Thomas Sowell. Sowell was born in the Jim Crow South and grew >>> up in a house without hot water or electricity. His father died before >>> he was born, and his mother died soon after. As a teenager, he did a >>> brief stint in a homeless shelter, sleeping with a knife under his >>> pillow. Years later, he somehow managed to make it to Harvard >>> UniversityÂbefore affirmative action existed to cast a doubt over such >>> achievementsÂand he began what would become one of the great >>> intellectual careers in modern American history. >>> >>> Or think of Roland Fryer. Fryer was abandoned at birth by his mother. >>> His father, meanwhile, was an abusive, gambling alcoholic who ended up >>> in prison for rape. He also spent quite a bit of time with his >>> great-aunt and cousins, who ran a major crack cocaine operation. Perhaps >>> unsurprisingly, by his teenage years, Fryer was involved in petty crime. >>> Yet he managed to get into college on an athletic scholarship and then >>> caught the economics bug. He would go on to become an award-winning >>> economics professor at Harvard. >>> >>> Or consider Glenn Loury. Loury grew up in a redlined, working-class >>> neighborhood on the South Side of Chicago in the 1950s. During his >>> teens, he fathered two children, and supported them by working in a >>> printing plantÂall while taking classes at a community college. >>> Eventually, he worked his way up to MIT, where he earned a PhD. And >>> despite his later crack cocaine addiction, Loury went on to an >>> illustrious career as an economist and political commentator. >>> >>> In an alternate reality, Sowell, Fryer, and Loury would be heroes of the >>> left, just like Jason Arday was until his downfall. After all, it is the >>> left and not the right that frequently talks about Âcentering black >>> voices. But thereÂs one problem. Though progressives would never say >>> this out loud, people like Sowell, Fryer, and Loury donÂt serve the >>> purpose for which black intellectuals are intended, which is not to >>> advance research or fight for the interests of black people but rather >>> to scratch a very specific psychological itch in the white liberal psyche. >>> >>> In the progressive mind, white people are forever the problem and need >>> to be told that purging the racism within their hearts is the key to >>> black advancement. Black intellectuals who ritualistically affirm this >>> belief  people like Ta-Nehisi Coates, Ibram X. Kendi, and Nikole >>> Hannah-Jones  are useful. They are serving their intended purpose. >>> Black intellectuals who donÂt do this are not just useless; they are an >>> active threat to the white guilt complex. >>> >>> Sowell, for example, has spent his career arguing, quite persuasively, >>> that discrimination is not the only possible cause of racial disparities >>> and that culture matters a great deal, too. Fryer has argued, again >>> persuasively, that American police departments are no likelier to use >>> deadly force on black suspects than on suspects who arenÂt black; that >>> Justice Department pattern-or-practice investigations into police >>> agencies (often favored by Democratic administrations) cause an increase >>> in violent crime, which hurts the black community most; and that the >>> Âacting white penalty imposed by the black community on its own members >>> is a real thing. Loury, for his part, has a long-running podcast with >>> John McWhorter (a self-described Âcranky liberal DemocratÂ) that has >>> featured some of the best criticisms of woke racial politics out there. >>> >>> So with all of the genuinely inspiring black intellectuals rendered >>> useless by their stubborn independence of mind, who is left to scratch >>> this guilty itch in the liberal psyche? Well, it would seem that the >>> second string has had to suffice. And thatÂs where the Jason Ardays of >>> the world come in. It should go without saying that ArdayÂs death is a >>> terrible tragedy that no one should celebrate. At the same time, it is >>> true to say that this tragedy was enabled by the psychological need >>> among liberal elites for a black avatar of their guilt. >>> >>> ArdayÂs death should be a call for liberals and progressives to look >>> inward  not to expunge the supposed demon of white supremacy, but to >>> look at the nature of white guilt itself. Ultimately, white guilt is a >>> virus that leads its victims to prioritize their own need for catharsis >>> over the publicÂs need for truth. The moment that elites in the West >>> have this much-needed epiphany en masse will be the moment that we >>> ensure the tragic case of Jason Arday never repeats itself. >>> >>> Coleman Hughes -- Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain Don't get political with me young man or I'll tie you to a railroad track and <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>> Who dares to talk to El Sombrero? dares: Ned does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away