Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?
Noah Sombrero <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Noah's Kitchen |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:52:20 -0700, dart200 <[email protected]> wrote: >On 8/18/26 8:50 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:28:33 -0700, dart200 >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 8/18/26 5:54 PM, Creon wrote: >>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 10:39 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:24 PM, Dude wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:40 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's >>>>>>>>>>> basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly >>>>>>>>>>> narratives from croaking out completely >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and >>>>>>>>>>> capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic >>>>>>>>>>> freedom on this planet >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state. >>>>>>>>> i'm sorry... why can't you have a global welfare state? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> rhetorical question dud: it's because capitalism hasn't been >>>>>>>>> prosperous enough >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> basically we have closed borders and shit on the basic freedom of 7/8 >>>>>>>>> of the total global population because capitalism needs to maintain >>>>>>>>> it's ungodly stupid narrative of "general prosperity" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Â Â > you people are fucking psychos tbh >>>>>>>>> Â Â > >>>>>>>>> Â Â > #god >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live there. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who >>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their >>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in >>>>>>>> with the >>>>>>> >>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, they >>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u fucking >>>>>>> racist tard >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would) >>>>>>>> destroy their nation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% latino, 5% >>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our >>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to >>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact people >>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the residents who >>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on this >>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh feeeelz" you >>>>>>> inhumane prick >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that would be >>>>>>>> destroyed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic >>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much of a >>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would >>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing Putin >>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines? >>>>> >>>>> Fallacy alert: ad absurdum. You really gotta cut that out, wilson. >>>> >>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply >>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them. >>>> >>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid. >>>> >>> >>> creon is correct about that ad absurdum is a valid argument style, the >>> term noah was looking for is slippery slope fallacy >> >> Not so. > >??? Wiki calls it Reduction ad absurd um https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum -- Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain Don't get political with me young man or I'll tie you to a railroad track and <<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>> Who dares to talk to El Sombrero? dares: Ned does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away