Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On 8/18/2026 8:54 PM, Creon wrote:
> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live there.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who
>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their
>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in
>>>>> with the
>>>>
>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, they
>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u fucking
>>>> racist tard
>>>>
>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would)
>>>>> destroy their nation.
>>>>
>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% latino, 5%
>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our
>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to
>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact people
>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the residents who
>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>>>
>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on this
>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh feeeelz" you
>>>> inhumane prick
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that would be
>>>>> destroyed.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic
>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much of a
>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>>
>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would
>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>>>
>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing Putin
>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
>>
>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, wilson.
> 
> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply
> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
> 
> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
> 

I think I should have used the Chinese as an example instead of Russians 
as that would be more likely in the Philippines. That potential is a 
solid one and not absurd at all.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-orders-foreign-workers-offshore-gaming-hubs-leave-2-months-2024-07-24/

"Philippine immigration chief Norman Tansingco said in a statement 
foreign workers had 59 days to leave the country. Around 20,000 people 
are expected to be affected by the order, most of them Chinese citizens.
Workers who stay in the country beyond the two-month period will be 
deported, he added."

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3364178/beijing-and-manila-clash-over-arrests-illegal-workers-tensions-worsen

"In May, Teodoro directed armed forces to detain 70 allegedly 
undocumented Chinese nationals at the Sanjia Steel Corporation plant, 
prompting formal protests from Beijing and consular visits."

It looks like the Philippine government has a strict policy around 
immigration and has no problem deporting people who don't follow their 
rules.