Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:34:49 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On 8/18/2026 8:54 PM, Creon wrote:
>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who
>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their
>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in
>>>>>> with the
>>>>>
>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, they
>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u fucking
>>>>> racist tard
>>>>>
>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would)
>>>>>> destroy their nation.
>>>>>
>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% latino, 5%
>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our
>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to
>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact people
>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the residents who
>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>>>>
>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on this
>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh feeeelz" you
>>>>> inhumane prick
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that would be
>>>>>> destroyed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic
>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much of a
>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>>>
>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would
>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing Putin
>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
>>>
>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, wilson.
>> 
>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply
>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
>> 
>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
>> 
>
>I think I should have used the Chinese as an example instead of Russians 
>as that would be more likely in the Philippines. That potential is a 
>solid one and not absurd at all.
>
>https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-orders-foreign-workers-offshore-gaming-hubs-leave-2-months-2024-07-24/
>
>"Philippine immigration chief Norman Tansingco said in a statement 
>foreign workers had 59 days to leave the country. Around 20,000 people 
>are expected to be affected by the order, most of them Chinese citizens.
>Workers who stay in the country beyond the two-month period will be 
>deported, he added."
>
>https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3364178/beijing-and-manila-clash-over-arrests-illegal-workers-tensions-worsen
>
>"In May, Teodoro directed armed forces to detain 70 allegedly 
>undocumented Chinese nationals at the Sanjia Steel Corporation plant, 
>prompting formal protests from Beijing and consular visits."
>
>It looks like the Philippine government has a strict policy around 
>immigration and has no problem deporting people who don't follow their 
>rules.

The chinese were never their pals.  Russians however...
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away