Re: New Car Reviews
Tara <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 19, 2026 at 4:12:29 PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/08/2026 20:56, Wilson wrote: >> On 8/19/2026 3:32 PM, Julian wrote: >>> On 19/08/2026 19:46, Wilson wrote: >>>> On 8/19/2026 11:31 AM, Julian wrote: >>>>> On 19/08/2026 16:04, Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 8/18/2026 8:02 PM, Dude wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 8:43 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 7:56 PM, Dude wrote: >>>>>>>>> "We planned on a year of bare-bones motoring. These features >>>>>>>>> make us feel like we're cheating." - Aaron Gold, Aug 17, 2026 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Motor Trend: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Five—No, Six—Sorry, Eight—Features I Didn't Expect in Our >>>>>>>>> $25,000 Kia K4 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/2mmsamkj >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> most of those are software feature that cost zero to replicate >>>>>>>> once implemented. the fact they aren't standard across all new >>>>>>>> cars is kind of a market failure imo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> You forgot to mention the Kia warranty: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Powertrain Warranty: 10 years or 100,000 miles for engine, >>>>>>> transmission, and drive parts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Basic Warranty: 5 years or 60,000 miles for most other vehicle >>>>>>> parts (bumper-to-bumper). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anti-Perforation Warranty: 5 years or 100,000 miles for rust hole >>>>>>> damage on body sheet metal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Roadside Assistance: 5 years or 60,000 miles for 24/7 help like >>>>>>> towing or flat tires. >>>>>> >>>>>> They need those because they have a deservedly bad reputation for >>>>>> reliability. >>>>> >>>>> Certainly a decade and more ago and until five years ago >>>>> easily stolen but, at least in Europe, they are well above >>>>> average, in the top 10, for reliability. >>>>> https://www.whatcar.com/news/are-kia-cars-reliable-most-and-least- >>>>> reliable-models-revealed/n27619 >>>> >>>> I might be behind the times in my negative attitude towards the Koreans. >>>> >>>> "Kia (and sister brand Hyundai) transformed from lower-tier >>>> reliability in the early 2010s through major quality investments, >>>> platform sharing, and engineering improvements. Recent models are >>>> generally viewed as dependable daily drivers with competitive build >>>> quality. >>> >>> "Made in Korea" signified "Cheap imitation" until the 1980's which >>> fixed the post war economy and facilitated big national investment >>> in the likes of Samsung, Hyundai, LG and Daewoo. By 2000 they were >>> becoming among the elite in advanced heavy, shipbuilding etc., and >>> electrical/onic engineering. >>> >>> There's one thing they are not very good at making and that is >>> people... >>> >>> According to United Nations and demographic projections, South Korea's >>> total fertility rate is expected to slowly rebound from its historic >>> lows to approximately 1.0 child per woman by 2050, remaining well >>> below the 2.1 replacement level needed for a stable population >>> >> >> That country is going to go extinct unless they change that. > > Yes, and they know it. In 2024 the rate was the global lowest. > https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-68402139 Why is the population decline upsetting to many people (other than to those who don't want more kids). Honestly, I don't understand and would like to.