Re: New Car Reviews
Tara <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Julian <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/08/2026 23:05, Tara wrote: >> On Aug 19, 2026 at 5:47:23 PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 19/08/2026 22:22, Tara wrote: >>>> On Aug 19, 2026 at 4:58:52 PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 19/08/2026 21:33, Tara wrote: >>>>>> On Aug 19, 2026 at 4:31:16 PM EDT, "Tara" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Aug 19, 2026 at 4:12:29 PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 19/08/2026 20:56, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/19/2026 3:32 PM, Julian wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 19/08/2026 19:46, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/19/2026 11:31 AM, Julian wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/08/2026 16:04, Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/18/2026 8:02 PM, Dude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 8:43 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 7:56 PM, Dude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "We planned on a year of bare-bones motoring. These features >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make us feel like we're cheating." - Aaron Gold, Aug 17, 2026 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Motor Trend: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Five—No, Six—Sorry, Eight—Features I Didn't Expect in Our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $25,000 Kia K4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://tinyurl.com/2mmsamkj >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of those are software feature that cost zero to replicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once implemented. the fact they aren't standard across all new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cars is kind of a market failure imo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You forgot to mention the Kia warranty: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Powertrain Warranty: 10 years or 100,000 miles for engine, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> transmission, and drive parts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basic Warranty: 5 years or 60,000 miles for most other vehicle >>>>>>>>>>>>>> parts (bumper-to-bumper). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anti-Perforation Warranty: 5 years or 100,000 miles for rust hole >>>>>>>>>>>>>> damage on body sheet metal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roadside Assistance: 5 years or 60,000 miles for 24/7 help like >>>>>>>>>>>>>> towing or flat tires. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They need those because they have a deservedly bad reputation for >>>>>>>>>>>>> reliability. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Certainly a decade and more ago and until five years ago >>>>>>>>>>>> easily stolen but, at least in Europe, they are well above >>>>>>>>>>>> average, in the top 10, for reliability. >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.whatcar.com/news/are-kia-cars-reliable-most-and-least- >>>>>>>>>>>> reliable-models-revealed/n27619 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I might be behind the times in my negative attitude towards the Koreans. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Kia (and sister brand Hyundai) transformed from lower-tier >>>>>>>>>>> reliability in the early 2010s through major quality investments, >>>>>>>>>>> platform sharing, and engineering improvements. Recent models are >>>>>>>>>>> generally viewed as dependable daily drivers with competitive build >>>>>>>>>>> quality. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Made in Korea" signified "Cheap imitation" until the 1980's which >>>>>>>>>> fixed the post war economy and facilitated big national investment >>>>>>>>>> in the likes of Samsung, Hyundai, LG and Daewoo. By 2000 they were >>>>>>>>>> becoming among the elite in advanced heavy, shipbuilding etc., and >>>>>>>>>> electrical/onic engineering. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There's one thing they are not very good at making and that is >>>>>>>>>> people... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> According to United Nations and demographic projections, South Korea's >>>>>>>>>> total fertility rate is expected to slowly rebound from its historic >>>>>>>>>> lows to approximately 1.0 child per woman by 2050, remaining well >>>>>>>>>> below the 2.1 replacement level needed for a stable population >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That country is going to go extinct unless they change that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, and they know it. In 2024 the rate was the global lowest. >>>>>>>> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-68402139 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why is the population decline upsetting to many people (other than to those >>>>>>> who don't want more kids). >>>>>>> Honestly, I don't understand and would like to. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it for purely monetary reasons? >>>>> >>>>> It's a big factor when the young have to support so many pensioners >>>>> and the cost of living is high but everywhere women get educated the >>>>> birth rate drops. "as women got more autonomy, making household >>>>> decisions, more power, they have to make some kind of compromise between >>>>> raising children and having more, kind of, autonomy in the workplace." >>>> >>>> I understand why women aren't having as many kids, all that, all those reasons >>>> you list. It appears that those who think it's a bad thing are looking at the >>>> 'big factor' then - the young having to support the elders and not having >>>> enough young to do that is a purely monetary concern. It would be a painful >>>> transition but when all the current oldies die, it will gradually even out >>>> with a lower population (young and seniors) balanced out over all. But for >>>> now, the complaint and worry about low birth rates is a monetary concern. I >>>> don't know why but I thought maybe it might be more than that. >>>> In ten years, who knows what the world will look like and women may be in a >>>> better position then to want more babies. Or not. >>>> We women, really do have a lot of power don't we. :) In concrete reality, this >>>> is a new concept. >>> >>> Pretty much the only places with stable or growing birth rates are those >>> where women have little or no rights, education and independent means. >>> >>> The UN expects the population to peak at just over 10 billion in 2080 >>> and then gradually decline sustainably as more women are emancipated >>> being progressively harder to keep them in the dark in this world. >> >> If it's a gradual decline, the change could happen with a minimum of pain if >> we accept and adjust to it. I admit, I want a lot fewer people on this planet >> mainly for the good of the planet. For creatures (humans included) - room to >> breath and grow...not too much though :) > > As far as I can tell there are always exactly the right number > of people on the planet for the good of the planet. I just can't > rustle up enough conceit to think otherwise. > > “Conceit..is to human character what salt is to the ocean; it keeps it sweet, and renders it endurable. “ -Oliver Wendell Holmes But everyone knows that’s just silly. If you claim a virtue, does that make you conceited? Surely not.