Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On 8/19/2026 5:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/19/26 2:03 PM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 8/19/2026 4:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/19/26 11:34 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/18/2026 8:54 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live 
>>>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people 
>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their
>>>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't 
>>>>>>>>> fit in
>>>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking 
>>>>>>>> about, they
>>>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u 
>>>>>>>> fucking
>>>>>>>> racist tard
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would)
>>>>>>>>> destroy their nation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% 
>>>>>>>> latino, 5%
>>>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our
>>>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't 
>>>>>>>> want to
>>>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact 
>>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the 
>>>>>>>>> residents who
>>>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on 
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh 
>>>>>>>> feeeelz" you
>>>>>>>> inhumane prick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that 
>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>> destroyed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic
>>>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that 
>>>>>>>> much of a
>>>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would
>>>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians 
>>>>>>> fleeing Putin
>>>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, wilson.
>>>>>
>>>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply
>>>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
>>>>>
>>>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think I should have used the Chinese as an example instead of 
>>>> Russians as that would be more likely in the Philippines. That 
>>>> potential is a solid one and not absurd at all.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-orders- 
>>>> foreign- workers-offshore-gaming-hubs-leave-2-months-2024-07-24/
>>>>
>>>> "Philippine immigration chief Norman Tansingco said in a statement 
>>>> foreign workers had 59 days to leave the country. Around 20,000 
>>>> people are expected to be affected by the order, most of them 
>>>> Chinese citizens.
>>>> Workers who stay in the country beyond the two-month period will be 
>>>> deported, he added."
>>>>
>>>> https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3364178/beijing- 
>>>> and- manila-clash-over-arrests-illegal-workers-tensions-worsen
>>>>
>>>> "In May, Teodoro directed armed forces to detain 70 allegedly 
>>>> undocumented Chinese nationals at the Sanjia Steel Corporation 
>>>> plant, prompting formal protests from Beijing and consular visits."
>>>>
>>>> It looks like the Philippine government has a strict policy around 
>>>> immigration and has no problem deporting people who don't follow 
>>>> their rules.
>>>>
>>>
>>> err some filipino official saying something and it actually happening 
>>> are too very different things wilson. heck prolly did actually deport 
>>> some, but to the extent that this actually stopped anything is a 
>>> totally different matter
>>>
>>> u have to understand the philippines is a archipelago not the far 
>>> from other mainlands, and they don't have that much of a navy to 
>>> speak of. they just don't have the resources to meaningfully protect 
>>> their borders all that well.
>>>
>>> nvm that much of the commercial oligarchy is already dominated by 
>>> filipino-chinese (chinoy) families, which ofc u'll never find really 
>>> detailed in the news cause journos are basically all brain dead 
>>> everywhere.
>>>
>>> they couldn't get rid of serious chinese influence even if they 
>>> wanted to, dicking about poor people with coercive measures is just 
>>> propaganda for sub-critical sheeple like you
>>>
>>
>> You aren't even addressing the thing: small countries want to protect 
>> their people from being overwhelmed.
>>
> 
> and you aren't even addressing the bigger thing:
> 
> you don't believe market economics is fair, apparently
> 

What do you mean by "fair".