Re: New Car Reviews
Wilson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/19/2026 5:22 PM, Tara wrote: > On Aug 19, 2026 at 4:58:52 PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 19/08/2026 21:33, Tara wrote: >>> On Aug 19, 2026 at 4:31:16 PM EDT, "Tara" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Aug 19, 2026 at 4:12:29 PM EDT, "Julian" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 19/08/2026 20:56, Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 8/19/2026 3:32 PM, Julian wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There's one thing they are not very good at making and that is >>>>>>> people... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> According to United Nations and demographic projections, South Korea's >>>>>>> total fertility rate is expected to slowly rebound from its historic >>>>>>> lows to approximately 1.0 child per woman by 2050, remaining well >>>>>>> below the 2.1 replacement level needed for a stable population >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That country is going to go extinct unless they change that. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, and they know it. In 2024 the rate was the global lowest. >>>>> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-68402139 >>>> >>>> Why is the population decline upsetting to many people (other than to those >>>> who don't want more kids). >>>> Honestly, I don't understand and would like to. >>> >>> Is it for purely monetary reasons? >> >> It's a big factor when the young have to support so many pensioners >> and the cost of living is high but everywhere women get educated the >> birth rate drops. "as women got more autonomy, making household >> decisions, more power, they have to make some kind of compromise between >> raising children and having more, kind of, autonomy in the workplace." > > I understand why women aren't having as many kids, all that, all those reasons > you list. It appears that those who think it's a bad thing are looking at the > 'big factor' then - the young having to support the elders and not having > enough young to do that is a purely monetary concern. It would be a painful > transition but when all the current oldies die, it will gradually even out > with a lower population (young and seniors) balanced out over all. But for > now, the complaint and worry about low birth rates is a monetary concern. I > don't know why but I thought maybe it might be more than that. > In ten years, who knows what the world will look like and women may be in a > better position then to want more babies. Or not. > We women, really do have a lot of power don't we. :) In concrete reality, this > is a new concept. Men have always known women have a lot of power. They control dating, sex, and marriage.