Re: Why the ‘Be Kind’ brigade are so ho rrible

On 8/20/26 1:54 PM, Dude wrote:
> On 8/19/2026 6:44 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/19/26 2:32 AM, Julian wrote:
>>> The Green Party came to prominence earlier this year by forever 
>>> promising ‘hope not hate’. Indeed, that dreamy yearning played a key 
>>> part in securing an unprecedented mandate in the May local elections, 
>>> when a callow cohort of progressive twenty-somethings, wooed by these 
>>> nice-sounding words, helped to put the Greens into power in many 
>>> inner- city councils. This is the same demographic who are also 
>>> receptive to similar utopian platitudes about abolishing borders, 
>>> housing immigrants, and free bus travel, free university education 
>>> and free childcare. Free everything, if possible, courtesy of ‘the 
>>> billionaires’, who in the Green Party’s ethereal vision will 
>>> obligingly pay for it all.
>>>
>>> Yet such charmingly naïve sentiments seems to jar with Green Party 
>>> rhetoric in regard to Israel and the Jews. When it comes to this 
>>> matter, their members are rather lacking in compassion, somewhat 
>>> short on soppy inanities. On this subject, they are hate-mongers of 
>>> the first order.
>>>
>>> Some Green Party activists now speak of British Jews being a ‘weapon’ 
>>> of Israel, describe hostility towards Jews as ‘understandable’, and 
>>> talk of ‘violent resistance’ and ‘armed struggle’ by Palestinians. 
>>> Messages in a private WhatsApp group used by Green members also 
>>> referred to ‘killing Zionists’. One participant in the group chat 
>>> described the majority of Israeli Jews as ‘genociders’, another 
>>> referred to Iran’s Islamic 
>>
>> so one of my therapists (who also lives here in the bay) is a catholic 
>> woman from syria. yes catholic, not muzzie.
>>
>> during the "arab spring" in 2011, the joos took this an opportunity to 
>> bomb a bunch of infrastructure. it's never been the same since, her 
>> parents still don't get reliable electricity from the utilities.
>>
> This might be a good time to discuss the results of the Arab Spring.
> 
> How did Israel manage to emerge from a complex, fast-moving, and 
> dangerous upheaval as a “winner”?

by receiving a bunch of money from the us and using that to bomb 
surrounding countries during the "upheavals" they incited

  > classic joo moves
  >
  > #god

> 
> The Times of Israel:
> 
> https://tinyurl.com/4yc7xnh6

dud u can't tell a demolition from a gravity driven collapse and just 
believe whatever the fuck suits ur inclination.

nvm all the blatant lies you constantly tell just because ur ethically 
gone to know the difference

> 
>> yet this entire article mentions nothing of the actual war crimes 
>> constantly being committing in that section of the planet. i have no 
>> idea who this is written for, but clearly someone who wants to stick 
>> their head up their asshole and keep acting like everything is cool 
>> when it isn't actually, because they aren't the ones directly affects 
>> by it
>>
>>   > good thing ur a mortal joolian
>>   >
>>   > #god
>>
> We look forward to your analysis of the Arab Spring. Thanks.
> 
> "In the aftermath of the Arab Spring in various countries, there was a 
> wave of violence and instability commonly known as the Arab Winter[336] 
> or Islamist Winter.[337] The Arab Winter was characterized by extensive 
> civil wars, general regional instability, economic and demographic 
> decline of the Arab League and overall religious wars between Sunni and 
> Shia Muslims."
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Spring
> 
>>> Revolutionary Guard Corps as ‘part of a national liberation 
>>> movement’, while one Green Party parish councillor on the Isle of 
>>> Wight, asked if their comment ‘Zionism has to go’ meant that they 
>>> would like Israel ‘wiped off the map, in essence?,’ replied: ‘Yes, I 
>>> would like that.’
>>>
>>> For a party that likes to preach pacifism, this is fighting talk 
>>> indeed. Yet far from representing a contradiction or an aberration, 
>>> such bellicose sentiment is wholly consistent with the worldview of 
>>> the idealistic, progressive left.
>>>
>>>  From the Jacobins to the Bolsheviks to the Khmer Rouge, those who 
>>> have combined idealistic utopianism, unassailable righteousness, the 
>>> pursuit of absolute egalitarianism, and a quasi-religious sense of 
>>> mission have always spoken with belligerence – and usually acted upon 
>>> it. The inevitable catastrophic and bloody fate of utopian movements 
>>> partly stems from the necessary payoff between liberty and equality – 
>>> you can have more of one only at the expense of having less of the 
>>> other, so the pursuit of complete equality must entail the complete 
>>> elimination of liberty – but it’s also the consequence of people 
>>> being beholden to unshakeable convictions.
>>>
>>> To paraphrase Yeats, those possessed with convictions and passionate 
>>> intensity are the worst types. Those who present themselves as 
>>> unquestionably caring and good and on the ‘right side of history’ 
>>> always feel at licence to behave as they please, because they see 
>>> their opponents as being on the side of evil.
>>>
>>> This is why many will also recognise another related, longer-standing 
>>> and similarly ostensible contradiction in politics: the propensity of 
>>> those who profess to ‘Be Kind’ to act abhorrently online. They feel 
>>> at liberty to be as vile and personal in their insults because all is 
>>> forgiven if you have right on your side. In the minds of the elect, 
>>> those who hold opposite opinions are already dehumanised.
>>>
>>> What makes the self-righteous fury of the hard-left today all the 
>>> more toxic is that it has been enabled by a culture that valorises 
>>> victimhood and equates it with moral superiority. Those who present 
>>> themselves as victims of political oppression, or ally themselves to 
>>> others in that position (in this case, the Palestinians) are even 
>>> more likely to have recourse to bellicose language. The wrath of 
>>> ideologues with good on their side is even harder to gainsay when 
>>> they add to their argument that they are victims, and that the pain 
>>> they feel is your fault – as a straight white man, or as someone who 
>>> is ‘right wing’, or as a Jew.
>>>
>>> This noxious admixture of ideological certitude, victimhood and 
>>> infantile sentimentality helps to explain the recent rise of ultra- 
>>> left violence. The return to the headlines last week of Luigi 
>>> Mangione is a reminder of how this combination works. It was not 
>>> merely Mangione’s actions that are telling – he shot and killed the 
>>> CEO of a private healthcare provider in December 2024 – but the 
>>> manner in which he was subsequently feted by those who think some 
>>> people deserve to die for being capitalists, for not being caring.
>>>
>>> Mangione’s actions can be seen in context with the murder of Charlie 
>>> Kirk, or in this country, the emergence of the militant transgender 
>>> rights group Bash Back, and indeed Palestine Action, an outfit which 
>>> also has no qualms about using violence if it’s for a ‘good cause’.
>>>
>>> One can therefore be shocked, but not confused, at what we are 
>>> hearing today from the mouths of some Greens. The boastfully 
>>> compassionate, those brimming with convictions, are often those who 
>>> are also full of hate.
>>>
>>>
>>> Patrick West
>>
>>
> 

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃