Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 16:59:57 -0700, dart200
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On 8/20/26 12:49 PM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 8/20/2026 1:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/20/26 6:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/19/2026 5:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/19/26 2:03 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/19/2026 4:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/19/26 11:34 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/18/2026 8:54 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero 
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> live there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people who
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fit in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking 
>>>>>>>>>>>> about, they
>>>>>>>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity 
>>>>>>>>>>>> u fucking
>>>>>>>>>>>> racist tard
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy their nation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% 
>>>>>>>>>>>> latino, 5%
>>>>>>>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our
>>>>>>>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't 
>>>>>>>>>>>> want to
>>>>>>>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> fact people
>>>>>>>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> residents who
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people 
>>>>>>>>>>>> on this
>>>>>>>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh 
>>>>>>>>>>>> feeeelz" you
>>>>>>>>>>>> inhumane prick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroyed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> economic
>>>>>>>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that 
>>>>>>>>>>>> much of a
>>>>>>>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same 
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians 
>>>>>>>>>>> fleeing Putin
>>>>>>>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, 
>>>>>>>>>> wilson.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply
>>>>>>>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think I should have used the Chinese as an example instead of 
>>>>>>>> Russians as that would be more likely in the Philippines. That 
>>>>>>>> potential is a solid one and not absurd at all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-orders- 
>>>>>>>> foreign- workers-offshore-gaming-hubs-leave-2-months-2024-07-24/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Philippine immigration chief Norman Tansingco said in a 
>>>>>>>> statement foreign workers had 59 days to leave the country. 
>>>>>>>> Around 20,000 people are expected to be affected by the order, 
>>>>>>>> most of them Chinese citizens.
>>>>>>>> Workers who stay in the country beyond the two-month period will 
>>>>>>>> be deported, he added."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3364178/ 
>>>>>>>> beijing- and- manila-clash-over-arrests-illegal-workers-tensions- 
>>>>>>>> worsen
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "In May, Teodoro directed armed forces to detain 70 allegedly 
>>>>>>>> undocumented Chinese nationals at the Sanjia Steel Corporation 
>>>>>>>> plant, prompting formal protests from Beijing and consular visits."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It looks like the Philippine government has a strict policy 
>>>>>>>> around immigration and has no problem deporting people who don't 
>>>>>>>> follow their rules.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> err some filipino official saying something and it actually 
>>>>>>> happening are too very different things wilson. heck prolly did 
>>>>>>> actually deport some, but to the extent that this actually stopped 
>>>>>>> anything is a totally different matter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> u have to understand the philippines is a archipelago not the far 
>>>>>>> from other mainlands, and they don't have that much of a navy to 
>>>>>>> speak of. they just don't have the resources to meaningfully 
>>>>>>> protect their borders all that well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nvm that much of the commercial oligarchy is already dominated by 
>>>>>>> filipino-chinese (chinoy) families, which ofc u'll never find 
>>>>>>> really detailed in the news cause journos are basically all brain 
>>>>>>> dead everywhere.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> they couldn't get rid of serious chinese influence even if they 
>>>>>>> wanted to, dicking about poor people with coercive measures is 
>>>>>>> just propaganda for sub-critical sheeple like you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You aren't even addressing the thing: small countries want to 
>>>>>> protect their people from being overwhelmed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> and you aren't even addressing the bigger thing:
>>>>>
>>>>> you don't believe market economics is fair, apparently
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What do you mean by "fair".
>>>>
>>>
>>> you tell me bro... ur the one that supports coercively chaining 7/8ths 
>>> of the planet to their respective nation states, because opening it up 
>>> and allowing the market to work freely across borders is "unfair" to you
>> 
>> Apparently you're not smart enough to understand, as I keep telling you 
>> what I think and you keep repeating your tired talking points.
>> 
>
>and i'm going to keep repeating it cause i'm tired of u not actually 
>accepting in the fairness of open free markets

My guess:  he doesn't care what you are tired of.
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away