Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

At Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:26:30 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:52:20 -0700, dart200
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >On 8/18/26 8:50 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:28:33 -0700, dart200
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On 8/18/26 5:54 PM, Creon wrote:
> >>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 10:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:24 PM, Dude wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's
> >>>>>>>>>>> basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly
> >>>>>>>>>>> narratives from croaking out completely
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and
> >>>>>>>>>>> capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic
> >>>>>>>>>>> freedom on this planet
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
> >>>>>>>>> i'm sorry... why can't you have a global welfare state?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> rhetorical question dud: it's because capitalism hasn't been
> >>>>>>>>> prosperous enough
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> basically we have closed borders and shit on the basic freedom of 7/8
> >>>>>>>>> of the total global population because capitalism needs to maintain
> >>>>>>>>> it's ungodly stupid narrative of "general prosperity"
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>     > you people are fucking psychos tbh
> >>>>>>>>>     >
> >>>>>>>>>     > #god
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live there.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who
> >>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their
> >>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in
> >>>>>>>> with the
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, they
> >>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u fucking
> >>>>>>> racist tard
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would)
> >>>>>>>> destroy their nation.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% latino, 5%
> >>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our
> >>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to
> >>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact people
> >>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the residents who
> >>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on this
> >>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh feeeelz" you
> >>>>>>> inhumane prick
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that would be
> >>>>>>>> destroyed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic
> >>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much of a
> >>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would
> >>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing Putin
> >>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, wilson.
> >>>>
> >>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply
> >>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
> >>>>
> >>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> creon is correct about that ad absurdum is a valid argument style, the
> >>> term noah was looking for is slippery slope fallacy
> >> 
> >> Not so.
> >
> >???
> 
> Wiki calls it Reduction ad absurd um
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum

Now if you would only read the entry...

-- 
-c System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G
   OS: Linux 7.2.0 D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
   NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Ti (24G) (610.57.04)
   "One way to stop a run away horse is to bet on him."