Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On 8/21/2026 12:26 AM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/20/26 5:44 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 16:59:57 -0700, dart200
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/20/26 12:49 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/20/2026 1:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/20/26 6:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/19/2026 5:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/19/26 2:03 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/19/2026 4:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/19/26 11:34 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/18/2026 8:54 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> live there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fit in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about, they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u fucking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> racist tard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy their nation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> latino, 5%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "lost" our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fact people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> residents who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feeeelz" you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inhumane prick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroyed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> economic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fleeing Putin
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out,
>>>>>>>>>>>> wilson.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies 
>>>>>>>>>>> simply
>>>>>>>>>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think I should have used the Chinese as an example instead of
>>>>>>>>>> Russians as that would be more likely in the Philippines. That
>>>>>>>>>> potential is a solid one and not absurd at all.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-orders-
>>>>>>>>>> foreign- workers-offshore-gaming-hubs-leave-2-months-2024-07-24/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Philippine immigration chief Norman Tansingco said in a
>>>>>>>>>> statement foreign workers had 59 days to leave the country.
>>>>>>>>>> Around 20,000 people are expected to be affected by the order,
>>>>>>>>>> most of them Chinese citizens.
>>>>>>>>>> Workers who stay in the country beyond the two-month period will
>>>>>>>>>> be deported, he added."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3364178/
>>>>>>>>>> beijing- and- manila-clash-over-arrests-illegal-workers-tensions-
>>>>>>>>>> worsen
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "In May, Teodoro directed armed forces to detain 70 allegedly
>>>>>>>>>> undocumented Chinese nationals at the Sanjia Steel Corporation
>>>>>>>>>> plant, prompting formal protests from Beijing and consular 
>>>>>>>>>> visits."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It looks like the Philippine government has a strict policy
>>>>>>>>>> around immigration and has no problem deporting people who don't
>>>>>>>>>> follow their rules.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> err some filipino official saying something and it actually
>>>>>>>>> happening are too very different things wilson. heck prolly did
>>>>>>>>> actually deport some, but to the extent that this actually stopped
>>>>>>>>> anything is a totally different matter
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> u have to understand the philippines is a archipelago not the far
>>>>>>>>> from other mainlands, and they don't have that much of a navy to
>>>>>>>>> speak of. they just don't have the resources to meaningfully
>>>>>>>>> protect their borders all that well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> nvm that much of the commercial oligarchy is already dominated by
>>>>>>>>> filipino-chinese (chinoy) families, which ofc u'll never find
>>>>>>>>> really detailed in the news cause journos are basically all brain
>>>>>>>>> dead everywhere.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> they couldn't get rid of serious chinese influence even if they
>>>>>>>>> wanted to, dicking about poor people with coercive measures is
>>>>>>>>> just propaganda for sub-critical sheeple like you
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You aren't even addressing the thing: small countries want to
>>>>>>>> protect their people from being overwhelmed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and you aren't even addressing the bigger thing:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you don't believe market economics is fair, apparently
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you mean by "fair".
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> you tell me bro... ur the one that supports coercively chaining 7/8ths
>>>>> of the planet to their respective nation states, because opening it up
>>>>> and allowing the market to work freely across borders is "unfair" 
>>>>> to you
>>>>
>>>> Apparently you're not smart enough to understand, as I keep telling you
>>>> what I think and you keep repeating your tired talking points.
>>>>
>>>
>>> and i'm going to keep repeating it cause i'm tired of u not actually
>>> accepting in the fairness of open free markets
>>
>> My guess:  he doesn't care what you are tired of.
> 
> well i'm not going to tire of reminding him he's not actually fan of 
> open markets, because he doesn't feel the consequences of them are 
> advantageous to his preferred race of peoples (which really does 
> undercut his claims that open markets are _most_ efficient)
> 
>   > 7 out of 8 of us people on this planet are currently
>   > in a state of oppression imposed by coercive nation-statism
>   >
>   > #god
> 

I support allowing the Filipinos to decide who gets to live in their 
country.