Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On 8/21/26 9:27 AM, Wilson wrote:
> On 8/20/2026 7:59 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/20/26 12:49 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 8/20/2026 1:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 8/20/26 6:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 8/19/2026 5:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/19/26 2:03 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/19/2026 4:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/19/26 11:34 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/18/2026 8:54 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero 
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> live there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't fit in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about, they
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> humanity u fucking
>>>>>>>>>>>>> racist tard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy their nation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> latino, 5%
>>>>>>>>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "lost" our
>>>>>>>>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fact people
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> residents who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people on this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> feeeelz" you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> inhumane prick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroyed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> economic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that much of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> same would
>>>>>>>>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians 
>>>>>>>>>>>> fleeing Putin
>>>>>>>>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, 
>>>>>>>>>>> wilson.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies 
>>>>>>>>>> simply
>>>>>>>>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think I should have used the Chinese as an example instead of 
>>>>>>>>> Russians as that would be more likely in the Philippines. That 
>>>>>>>>> potential is a solid one and not absurd at all.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-orders- 
>>>>>>>>> foreign- workers-offshore-gaming-hubs-leave-2-months-2024-07-24/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Philippine immigration chief Norman Tansingco said in a 
>>>>>>>>> statement foreign workers had 59 days to leave the country. 
>>>>>>>>> Around 20,000 people are expected to be affected by the order, 
>>>>>>>>> most of them Chinese citizens.
>>>>>>>>> Workers who stay in the country beyond the two-month period 
>>>>>>>>> will be deported, he added."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3364178/ 
>>>>>>>>> beijing- and- manila-clash-over-arrests-illegal-workers- 
>>>>>>>>> tensions- worsen
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "In May, Teodoro directed armed forces to detain 70 allegedly 
>>>>>>>>> undocumented Chinese nationals at the Sanjia Steel Corporation 
>>>>>>>>> plant, prompting formal protests from Beijing and consular 
>>>>>>>>> visits."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It looks like the Philippine government has a strict policy 
>>>>>>>>> around immigration and has no problem deporting people who 
>>>>>>>>> don't follow their rules.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> err some filipino official saying something and it actually 
>>>>>>>> happening are too very different things wilson. heck prolly did 
>>>>>>>> actually deport some, but to the extent that this actually 
>>>>>>>> stopped anything is a totally different matter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> u have to understand the philippines is a archipelago not the 
>>>>>>>> far from other mainlands, and they don't have that much of a 
>>>>>>>> navy to speak of. they just don't have the resources to 
>>>>>>>> meaningfully protect their borders all that well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> nvm that much of the commercial oligarchy is already dominated 
>>>>>>>> by filipino-chinese (chinoy) families, which ofc u'll never find 
>>>>>>>> really detailed in the news cause journos are basically all 
>>>>>>>> brain dead everywhere.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> they couldn't get rid of serious chinese influence even if they 
>>>>>>>> wanted to, dicking about poor people with coercive measures is 
>>>>>>>> just propaganda for sub-critical sheeple like you
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You aren't even addressing the thing: small countries want to 
>>>>>>> protect their people from being overwhelmed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and you aren't even addressing the bigger thing:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you don't believe market economics is fair, apparently
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you mean by "fair".
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> you tell me bro... ur the one that supports coercively chaining 
>>>> 7/8ths of the planet to their respective nation states, because 
>>>> opening it up and allowing the market to work freely across borders 
>>>> is "unfair" to you
>>>
>>> Apparently you're not smart enough to understand, as I keep telling 
>>> you what I think and you keep repeating your tired talking points.
>>>
>>
>> and i'm going to keep repeating it cause i'm tired of u not actually 
>> accepting in the fairness of open free markets
>>
> 
> You need to convince the people not me.

ur a person last time i checked

-- 
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃