Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On 8/21/2026 9:55 AM, dart200 wrote:
> On 8/21/26 9:27 AM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 8/20/2026 7:59 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 8/20/26 12:49 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 8/20/2026 1:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 8/20/26 6:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/19/2026 5:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/19/26 2:03 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/19/2026 4:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/19/26 11:34 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/18/2026 8:54 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero 
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who live there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't fit in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about, they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humanity u fucking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> racist tard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy their nation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 25% latino, 5%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "lost" our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fact people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> residents who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people on this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feeeelz" you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inhumane prick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroyed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> economic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that much of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> same would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fleeing Putin
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippines?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wilson.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies 
>>>>>>>>>>> simply
>>>>>>>>>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think I should have used the Chinese as an example instead 
>>>>>>>>>> of Russians as that would be more likely in the Philippines. 
>>>>>>>>>> That potential is a solid one and not absurd at all.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-orders- 
>>>>>>>>>> foreign- workers-offshore-gaming-hubs-leave-2-months-2024-07-24/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Philippine immigration chief Norman Tansingco said in a 
>>>>>>>>>> statement foreign workers had 59 days to leave the country. 
>>>>>>>>>> Around 20,000 people are expected to be affected by the order, 
>>>>>>>>>> most of them Chinese citizens.
>>>>>>>>>> Workers who stay in the country beyond the two-month period 
>>>>>>>>>> will be deported, he added."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3364178/ 
>>>>>>>>>> beijing- and- manila-clash-over-arrests-illegal-workers- 
>>>>>>>>>> tensions- worsen
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "In May, Teodoro directed armed forces to detain 70 allegedly 
>>>>>>>>>> undocumented Chinese nationals at the Sanjia Steel Corporation 
>>>>>>>>>> plant, prompting formal protests from Beijing and consular 
>>>>>>>>>> visits."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It looks like the Philippine government has a strict policy 
>>>>>>>>>> around immigration and has no problem deporting people who 
>>>>>>>>>> don't follow their rules.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> err some filipino official saying something and it actually 
>>>>>>>>> happening are too very different things wilson. heck prolly did 
>>>>>>>>> actually deport some, but to the extent that this actually 
>>>>>>>>> stopped anything is a totally different matter
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> u have to understand the philippines is a archipelago not the 
>>>>>>>>> far from other mainlands, and they don't have that much of a 
>>>>>>>>> navy to speak of. they just don't have the resources to 
>>>>>>>>> meaningfully protect their borders all that well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> nvm that much of the commercial oligarchy is already dominated 
>>>>>>>>> by filipino-chinese (chinoy) families, which ofc u'll never 
>>>>>>>>> find really detailed in the news cause journos are basically 
>>>>>>>>> all brain dead everywhere.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> they couldn't get rid of serious chinese influence even if they 
>>>>>>>>> wanted to, dicking about poor people with coercive measures is 
>>>>>>>>> just propaganda for sub-critical sheeple like you
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You aren't even addressing the thing: small countries want to 
>>>>>>>> protect their people from being overwhelmed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and you aren't even addressing the bigger thing:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you don't believe market economics is fair, apparently
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you mean by "fair".
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> you tell me bro... ur the one that supports coercively chaining 
>>>>> 7/8ths of the planet to their respective nation states, because 
>>>>> opening it up and allowing the market to work freely across borders 
>>>>> is "unfair" to you
>>>>
>>>> Apparently you're not smart enough to understand, as I keep telling 
>>>> you what I think and you keep repeating your tired talking points.
>>>>
>>>
>>> and i'm going to keep repeating it cause i'm tired of u not actually 
>>> accepting in the fairness of open free markets
>>>
>>
>> You need to convince the people not me.
> 
> ur a person last time i checked
> 
Repeat what?

Virtually 99.9% of all nations use some form of free market capitalist 
economic trade.

, but no pure, 100% free-market economy exists. Instead, over 180 
countries operate mixed economies with varying degrees of state 
intervention.